Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I predict changes to the charter language immersion paradigm (few native speakers in most of the programs, admins not necessarily speaking the target language, bilingual kids not allowed to test in to replace dropouts etc.) once several years worth of DCI kids have applied to college. This won't happen for 7 or 8 years.
I predict that many parents are going to complain when too many of the DCI seniors don't do as well on either International Baccalaureate exams (graded in Geneva) or SAT II subject tests as expected.
DC Charter is putting too much emphasis on equality/access to these programs and not enough on high standards in target language instruction and learning. We're lacking an acid test for quality for the time being because language learners aren't taking national standardized tests yet. The problems begin in PS3 and not because instruction is 100% in the target language.
To me this is bizarrely negative speculation without any data to base it on. So if you have data, please share: on do you base your sense that DCI seniors won't do as well on IB exams or SAT subjects? Whether you think they won't do well "as expected" (in which case, please state your source for expectations), or if you mean you don't expect them to test as well as comparable IB programs, what programs and why do you think they won't do as well?
Lastly, if by your own post you say "we're lacking an acid test for quality", on what do you base your conclusion that however DC charters are handling dual language, that they're doing it in a way at the cost of quality language instruction? You generalize in your post, so your basis would need to be more than just one or two schools. What are you basing that on if you yourself say there is no acid test yet?
Anonymous wrote:We're raising our children bilingual in a language not taught in a DC immersion program.
One of us speaks no English to the kids, and we send them to a heritage language school on weekends during the school year as well as summer camp abroad (not a camp for expats, one for ordinary local children who speak little English). We don't allow them to watch TV in English (they watch DVDs in the target language). My in-laws, whose English isn't the best are very involved, and we host au pairs who speak the target language year after year. Our kids don't need English to get through the day. They attend a high-performing DCPS elementary school, where they score high in English.
Few of the parents we know who choose language immersion in DC seem very serious about the exercise to us. The schools don't seem terribly serious about it either - some lack target-language speaking admins and fully bilingual children, policies and practices many parents in the school communities defend to the hilt.
I mention all this because I've become skeptical about how language immersion programs work in this city. I'd be surprised if most of these kids speak the target language well as adults. Things are different in the burbs and other US cities.
If I couldn't support target language learning at home consistently, I'd pass on having my kids learn a second (or 3rd) language until the upper elementary grades, at the earliest. Little kids learn languages easily, and all but forget them just as easily if they aren't reinforced into the teen years.
Anonymous wrote:I predict changes to the charter language immersion paradigm (few native speakers in most of the programs, admins not necessarily speaking the target language, bilingual kids not allowed to test in to replace dropouts etc.) once several years worth of DCI kids have applied to college. This won't happen for 7 or 8 years.
I predict that many parents are going to complain when too many of the DCI seniors don't do as well on either International Baccalaureate exams (graded in Geneva) or SAT II subject tests as expected.
DC Charter is putting too much emphasis on equality/access to these programs and not enough on high standards in target language instruction and learning. We're lacking an acid test for quality for the time being because language learners aren't taking national standardized tests yet. The problems begin in PS3 and not because instruction is 100% in the target language.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I went to the Yu Ying open house the other night expecting to love it, since it seems like there are tons of benefits of dual language, and Chinese seems like it would be especially useful. There were a lot of really impressive aspects of the program; however, there were two things that the administrators said that have stuck with me. One is that the early childhood kids are usually "miserable" for a few months, since the program is 100% in Chinese and they are just lost for a while. I realize that this may be more of an issue with Chinese than with other languages, since it is so different from English, but I could see my toddler getting really overwhelmed in that environment. On the other hand, kids are resilient, and maybe that misery would be worth it for long-term gain. Second, they said that the test scores in 3rd grade tend to be lower than other schools because the kids are only learning in English for 90 days a year. I don't really care about the test scores component, because what they said makes sense. It did make me start to wonder whether the dual language model means that some other classes get the shrift, not just English, but also math, science, etc., since so much of the focus is on dual language.
So, as I contemplate my lottery picks for this year, I'm wondering whether those who have experience in dual language programs can talk about what has worked well and what hasn't. I'd also love to hear your experiences with the two points above (whether your child was miserable when he or she started the program and for how long, and whether you feel like academics in other subjects suffer). I don't mean to limit this to YY parents--I'd love to hear from people from other dual language programs, too. Trying to figure out whether dual language would be a good fit or whether to focus on monolingual programs moving forward. Thanks!
I wasn't present, but I suspect "Miserable" was intended as hyperbole.
I am a YY parent and in all fairness, I have heard that some students (mainly older siblings, entering for the first year) may have some culture-shock. (By no means all, my eldest was unfazed, though possibly more tired on Chinese days.)
Anonymous wrote:I went to the Yu Ying open house the other night expecting to love it, since it seems like there are tons of benefits of dual language, and Chinese seems like it would be especially useful. There were a lot of really impressive aspects of the program; however, there were two things that the administrators said that have stuck with me. One is that the early childhood kids are usually "miserable" for a few months, since the program is 100% in Chinese and they are just lost for a while. I realize that this may be more of an issue with Chinese than with other languages, since it is so different from English, but I could see my toddler getting really overwhelmed in that environment. On the other hand, kids are resilient, and maybe that misery would be worth it for long-term gain. Second, they said that the test scores in 3rd grade tend to be lower than other schools because the kids are only learning in English for 90 days a year. I don't really care about the test scores component, because what they said makes sense. It did make me start to wonder whether the dual language model means that some other classes get the shrift, not just English, but also math, science, etc., since so much of the focus is on dual language.
So, as I contemplate my lottery picks for this year, I'm wondering whether those who have experience in dual language programs can talk about what has worked well and what hasn't. I'd also love to hear your experiences with the two points above (whether your child was miserable when he or she started the program and for how long, and whether you feel like academics in other subjects suffer). I don't mean to limit this to YY parents--I'd love to hear from people from other dual language programs, too. Trying to figure out whether dual language would be a good fit or whether to focus on monolingual programs moving forward. Thanks!
Anonymous wrote:I went to the Yu Ying open house the other night expecting to love it, since it seems like there are tons of benefits of dual language, and Chinese seems like it would be especially useful. There were a lot of really impressive aspects of the program; however, there were two things that the administrators said that have stuck with me. One is that the early childhood kids are usually "miserable" for a few months, since the program is 100% in Chinese and they are just lost for a while. I realize that this may be more of an issue with Chinese than with other languages, since it is so different from English, but I could see my toddler getting really overwhelmed in that environment. On the other hand, kids are resilient, and maybe that misery would be worth it for long-term gain. Second, they said that the test scores in 3rd grade tend to be lower than other schools because the kids are only learning in English for 90 days a year. I don't really care about the test scores component, because what they said makes sense. It did make me start to wonder whether the dual language model means that some other classes get the shrift, not just English, but also math, science, etc., since so much of the focus is on dual language.
So, as I contemplate my lottery picks for this year, I'm wondering whether those who have experience in dual language programs can talk about what has worked well and what hasn't. I'd also love to hear your experiences with the two points above (whether your child was miserable when he or she started the program and for how long, and whether you feel like academics in other subjects suffer). I don't mean to limit this to YY parents--I'd love to hear from people from other dual language programs, too. Trying to figure out whether dual language would be a good fit or whether to focus on monolingual programs moving forward. Thanks!