Just try to cut defense spending and the right squeals.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Actually its liberalsm that has proven itself an utter disaster time and time again, seems the people have realized that. Don't believe me? Check the polls.
Try polling how popular liberal programs like Social Security and Medicare are sometime.
And how popular is the 16 trillion dollar debt and 40 trillion in unfounded liabilities…??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Actually its liberalsm that has proven itself an utter disaster time and time again, seems the people have realized that. Don't believe me? Check the polls.
Try polling how popular liberal programs like Social Security and Medicare are sometime.
And how popular is the 16 trillion dollar debt and 40 trillion in unfounded liabilities…??
Anonymous wrote:Actually its liberalsm that has proven itself an utter disaster time and time again, seems the people have realized that. Don't believe me? Check the polls.
Try polling how popular liberal programs like Social Security and Medicare are sometime.
Actually its liberalsm that has proven itself an utter disaster time and time again, seems the people have realized that. Don't believe me? Check the polls.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a conservative. Sometimes Rand is spot on when he talks about the excesses of some of our government programs, regulations and agencies. But there are times when he is to the Left of George McGovern and other times when he is just incomprehensible i.e. much of his foreign policy speech. I don't think he'll be a serious candidate.
Funny how some people define "left". In the past, conservatives were isolationist. And in the future one can hope they are not racist.
Rand Paul points out racial disparity in sentencing. If you replace "racial" with "ideological" and "sentencing" with "tax exempt status" you have a conservative cause celebre. And on top of it, you have one that has been studied to death, for generations!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a conservative. Sometimes Rand is spot on when he talks about the excesses of some of our government programs, regulations and agencies. But there are times when he is to the Left of George McGovern and other times when he is just incomprehensible i.e. much of his foreign policy speech. I don't think he'll be a serious candidate.
enjoy never winning the white house again.
Anonymous wrote:I'm a conservative. Sometimes Rand is spot on when he talks about the excesses of some of our government programs, regulations and agencies. But there are times when he is to the Left of George McGovern and other times when he is just incomprehensible i.e. much of his foreign policy speech. I don't think he'll be a serious candidate.
Anonymous wrote:Good for Rand Paul. On the D side, possible pres candidate Jim Webb has spoken eloquently about this and has sought to lead on the issue.
Anonymous wrote:I'm a conservative. Sometimes Rand is spot on when he talks about the excesses of some of our government programs, regulations and agencies. But there are times when he is to the Left of George McGovern and other times when he is just incomprehensible i.e. much of his foreign policy speech. I don't think he'll be a serious candidate.
Anonymous wrote:Paul is the first potential 2016 contender to visit the city
Sen. Rand Paul met with civil rights leaders Friday in Ferguson, Missouri, the city torn apart by racial unrest following the August shooting of an unarmed black teenager by a white police officer. During his visit, the Republican Senator, who is seen as a likely presidential candidate, stated his concerns about long prison sentences for nonviolent crimes, the loss of voting rights for felons and military programs to give unused equipment to local police departments.
“Given the racial disparities in our criminal justice system, it is impossible for African-Americans not to feel like their government is particularly targeting them,” Paul wrote in an opinion piece for TIME this summer.
http://time.com/3490123/rand-paul-ferguson/