Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. Very discouraged at these comments generally. Wish we had known bc we had other options besides LCTA and opted to try it over both private and parochial schools.
How could you not know that ACPS suck? It is a huge topic over and over on this board.
Anonymous wrote:OP I share your concern. My child is also in K there and previously had a rigorous full-day preK, so she is also well ahead of the curve. I think the teachers are still probably trying to get to know and evaluate each child. But I share your concerns. My daughter was on the ball and I have noticed a slip too. The other night she could not remember how to write a few uppercase letters, which surprised me, since she was writing full sentences using those letters two months ago. I am just trying to supplement at home with first grade workbooks.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. Very discouraged at these comments generally. Wish we had known bc we had other options besides LCTA and opted to try it over both private and parochial schools.
we have been considering moving to Arlington also, but just love our neighborhood so much. I really thought LCTA would be heads above some of the other public schools. Guess not. Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are there any other LCTA parents who have gone through kindergarten there and can give advice? I have been really disappointed thus far. All the school seems to focus on is behavior and discipline, and not on academics at all. My child was reading and writing well before he entered K there and now he is actually regressing and forgetting skills he knew. The kids haven't been tested yet or broken into reading groups. No books coming home. All I have been getting is a behavior chart and some cut and paste projects.
Will this improve? I am very concerned that he is going backwards at this school. Other friends with kindergarteners in private and other elementaries are doing more schoolwork!
I'm no fan of ACPS, but K isn't for academics. The first half is for teaching them how to be students, which is developmentally appropriate. K isn't supposed to be academic.
That's fine and good but in this area with lots of working parents, many kids enter k from full-day prek which essentially is kindergarten already. Does the school do anything to meet their level or must they sit bored for 6 months and lose the info they learned already? I thought ACPS differentiated in K.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are there any other LCTA parents who have gone through kindergarten there and can give advice? I have been really disappointed thus far. All the school seems to focus on is behavior and discipline, and not on academics at all. My child was reading and writing well before he entered K there and now he is actually regressing and forgetting skills he knew. The kids haven't been tested yet or broken into reading groups. No books coming home. All I have been getting is a behavior chart and some cut and paste projects.
Will this improve? I am very concerned that he is going backwards at this school. Other friends with kindergarteners in private and other elementaries are doing more schoolwork!
I'm no fan of ACPS, but K isn't for academics. The first half is for teaching them how to be students, which is developmentally appropriate. K isn't supposed to be academic.
Anonymous wrote:Are there any other LCTA parents who have gone through kindergarten there and can give advice? I have been really disappointed thus far. All the school seems to focus on is behavior and discipline, and not on academics at all. My child was reading and writing well before he entered K there and now he is actually regressing and forgetting skills he knew. The kids haven't been tested yet or broken into reading groups. No books coming home. All I have been getting is a behavior chart and some cut and paste projects.
Will this improve? I am very concerned that he is going backwards at this school. Other friends with kindergarteners in private and other elementaries are doing more schoolwork!