Anonymous wrote:
My m.s. daughter is very (naturally) thin. She wears leggings and a shirt sometimes but it doesn't look obnoxious because she isn't all about that bass.
Oh, I see. You think your daughter should be able to violate the dress code because she's thin.
???
Our ms doesn't have that in the dress code. But my, don't you have a body-type chip on your shoulder?[/quote]
Um, no. I am a size 4. I was commenting only on the sense of entitlement that you think your daughter deserves because she's thin.
Not PP, but you do sound like you're overreacting. All she said is the leggings don't look obscene because her child is thin. I get what she's saying. My daughter is so thin that the correct length leggings are baggy on her. They definitely don't cling to her. While my rule is generally leggings are worn under a dress in winter or with a shirt that's very long, my daughter comes down every once in a while in leggings and a shirt that's a few inches below her waste and I've let it go. If there was an explicit policy saying no leggings, running late or not, I'd make her change, but for some vague indecency standard, once every few months is not a big deal when there is nothing clinging, and definitely in no way obscene. I think that's all pp was saying.
My m.s. daughter is very (naturally) thin. She wears leggings and a shirt sometimes but it doesn't look obnoxious because she isn't all about that bass.
Oh, I see. You think your daughter should be able to violate the dress code because she's thin.
???
Our ms doesn't have that in the dress code. But my, don't you have a body-type chip on your shoulder?[/quote]
Um, no. I am a size 4. I was commenting only on the sense of entitlement that you think your daughter deserves because she's thin.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This was a trend when I was in junior high and high school 25+ years ago - it's nothing new. And I'm annoyed that schools ban it, particularly when the rule is applied only to girls. What kind of message does that send? It may not be a great look for some, but unless it is affecting their performance, why do you care?
I'm guessing that if a guy wanted to wear leggings, the administration would have an issue with that too.
Anonymous wrote:This was a trend when I was in junior high and high school 25+ years ago - it's nothing new. And I'm annoyed that schools ban it, particularly when the rule is applied only to girls. What kind of message does that send? It may not be a great look for some, but unless it is affecting their performance, why do you care?
Anonymous wrote:
My m.s. daughter is very (naturally) thin. She wears leggings and a shirt sometimes but it doesn't look obnoxious because she isn't all about that bass.
Oh, I see. You think your daughter should be able to violate the dress code because she's thin.![]()
My m.s. daughter is very (naturally) thin. She wears leggings and a shirt sometimes but it doesn't look obnoxious because she isn't all about that bass.
Anonymous wrote:My m.s. daughter is very (naturally) thin. She wears leggings and a shirt sometimes but it doesn't look obnoxious because she isn't all about that bass.