Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
why would he say such strong language?
Maybe that is what he means? Honesty? He's not my guy--but you can't fault honesty.
An aspiring president can't disown a group just because of their opinions on world affairs.
You mean "shouldn't", not "can't".
An honest one does. I know that's foreign to most
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
why would he say such strong language?
Maybe that is what he means? Honesty? He's not my guy--but you can't fault honesty.
An aspiring president can't disown a group just because of their opinions on world affairs.
You mean "shouldn't", not "can't".
An honest one does. I know that's foreign to most
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
why would he say such strong language?
Maybe that is what he means? Honesty? He's not my guy--but you can't fault honesty.
An aspiring president can't disown a group just because of their opinions on world affairs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
why would he say such strong language?
Maybe that is what he means? Honesty? He's not my guy--but you can't fault honesty.
An aspiring president can't disown a group just because of their opinions on world affairs.
Anonymous wrote:
why would he say such strong language?
Maybe that is what he means? Honesty? He's not my guy--but you can't fault honesty.
Anonymous wrote:This is what happens when you live in a bubble.
He thinks that Palestine problem is about religion. It's not.
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:
why would he say such strong language?
Maybe that is what he means? Honesty? He's not my guy--but you can't fault honesty.
One might fault him for refusing to stand with American citizens due to their stance regarding a foreign country. He could have agreed to disagree on foreign policy and looked to them for support on domestic social issues.
Anonymous wrote:
why would he say such strong language?
Maybe that is what he means? Honesty? He's not my guy--but you can't fault honesty.
why would he say such strong language?