Palisades troll.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Key family opting for private. Wish Hardy were as good as Deal.

Recent data on enrollment at Hardy strongly implies you will be wasting your money on private school.

Yup b/c Hardy is just as good as Sidwell and St. Albans

Errr, no, but even if you have the money for private, you'll have a difficult time getting into those schools. For anyone who is swimming in money and can somehow weasel their way into those schools, godspeed. But for almost everyone else, private school is an unwise investment compared to Hardy.

Anyone with that kind of money shouldn't be living in Ward 3 anyway -- where's your palatial estate on the Potomac shore?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let them be. People should feel free to spend their money however they please.

Yes, but they should not misrepresent the facts about Hardy.

Is it a misrepresentation to acknowledge that Hardy is not up to Deal's level? Really? Honestly, who among us, given the choice, would not choose Deal over Hardy?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Key family opting for private. Wish Hardy were as good as Deal.

Recent data on enrollment at Hardy strongly implies you will be wasting your money on private school.

Yup b/c Hardy is just as good as Sidwell and St. Albans

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Gosh, this never-ending obsession with IB enrollment at Hardy! It's starting to remind me of the guy who keeps posting about interracial relationships.

Or the superiority of private schools. Different obsessions entirely. Not sure if it remotely makes sense to compare a concern with IB enrollment at Hardy to weird obsessions, though.

I know. I was being hyperbolic. I'm sorry. (heh heh)

Anonymous wrote:Gosh, this never-ending obsession with IB enrollment at Hardy! It's starting to remind me of the guy who keeps posting about interracial relationships.

Yes! Nailed it! Perhaps OP and the interracial dating guy should go on a date. For their first one, I propose it happen on this coming Monday morning. After a coffee at Starbucks on Wisconsin and S Street, they could wander hand in hand over to Hardy and poll all the students going in to class.

Anonymous wrote:Gosh, this never-ending obsession with IB enrollment at Hardy! It's starting to remind me of the guy who keeps posting about interracial relationships.

Or the superiority of private schools. Different obsessions entirely. Not sure if it remotely makes sense to compare a concern with IB enrollment at Hardy to weird obsessions, though.

Gosh, this never-ending obsession with IB enrollment at Hardy! It's starting to remind me of the guy who keeps posting about interracial relationships.

Anonymous wrote:Let them be. People should feel free to spend their money however they please.

I was just trying to help with a little financial advice. But, on second thought, the kids at Hardy would be better off if they're not exposed to such faulty logic -- let them go private! Hardy kids need only the most capable student-colleagues.

Anonymous wrote:Let them be. People should feel free to spend their money however they please.

Yes, but they should not misrepresent the facts about Hardy.

Let them be. People should feel free to spend their money however they please.

Anonymous wrote:Key family opting for private. Wish Hardy were as good as Deal.

Recent data on enrollment at Hardy strongly implies you will be wasting your money on private school.

Key family opting for private. Wish Hardy were as good as Deal.

On another thread a poster says 40% IB for 6th ...

All last year there was a lot of discussion on how many children, from which IB schools would be attending Hardy this fall.

Any solid #'s now that we are a few days out from the 1st day of school?