Anonymous
Post 09/10/2014 08:00     Subject: Re:47 Inspector Generals Object to Obama Stonewalling
Anonymous wrote:[quote=Anonymous]Do you have just one clue who the inspectors general are? You are a low information stooge.




Yeah, I was waiting for that too. I was an SES-4 in the federal government and was reading to see if anyone knew what they were talking about. They don't of course.


NP here. I actually don't know anything about the inspectors general to know how to interpret this story. Can someone provide more information? Thanks!
Anonymous
Post 09/10/2014 07:53     Subject: Re:47 Inspector Generals Object to Obama Stonewalling
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Do you have just one clue who the inspectors general are? You are a low information stooge.
[/b]



Yeah, I was waiting for that too. I was an SES-4 in the federal government and was reading to see if anyone knew what they were talking about. They don't of course.


you trivialize this suggesting birth certificates and death panels.......plenty of people have died from thousands of guns given to Mexican drug cartels to the Benghazi 4 and more. You are a stooge.


Someone needs to install a seat belt on your rocker.
Anonymous
Post 09/10/2014 02:22     Subject: 47 Inspector Generals Object to Obama Stonewalling

"Inspectors General" are like district attorneys - political hacks looking for a better job. So no, I don't put much into this shit at all.
Anonymous
Post 09/10/2014 01:47     Subject: Re:47 Inspector Generals Object to Obama Stonewalling
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:[quote=Anonymous]Do you have just one clue who the inspectors general are? You are a low information stooge.




Yeah, I was waiting for that too. I was an SES-4 in the federal government and was reading to see if anyone knew what they were talking about. They don't of course.


you trivialize this suggesting birth certificates and death panels.......plenty of people have died from thousands of guns given to Mexican drug cartels to the Benghazi 4 and more. You are a stooge.



What are you talking about?
Anonymous
Post 09/10/2014 00:41     Subject: Re:47 Inspector Generals Object to Obama Stonewalling
Anonymous wrote:[quote=Anonymous]Do you have just one clue who the inspectors general are? You are a low information stooge.




Yeah, I was waiting for that too. I was an SES-4 in the federal government and was reading to see if anyone knew what they were talking about. They don't of course.


you trivialize this suggesting birth certificates and death panels.......plenty of people have died from thousands of guns given to Mexican drug cartels to the Benghazi 4 and more. You are a stooge.
Anonymous
Post 09/09/2014 22:26     Subject: Re:47 Inspector Generals Object to Obama Stonewalling
[quote=Anonymous]Do you have just one clue who the inspectors general are? You are a low information stooge.




Yeah, I was waiting for that too. I was an SES-4 in the federal government and was reading to see if anyone knew what they were talking about. They don't of course.
Anonymous
Post 09/09/2014 22:24     Subject: Re:47 Inspector Generals Object to Obama Stonewalling
Do you have just one clue who the inspectors general are? You are a low information stooge.
FruminousBandersnatch
Post 09/09/2014 20:33     Subject: 47 Inspector Generals Object to Obama Stonewalling
As an Obama supporter I've been truly disappointed at the lack of openness and the way the Obama administration has dealt with the press and with whistleblowers.

That being said, I also understand the hunker-down, siege mentality that is engendered when you're constantly under attack for things that are complete fiction (birth certificate, death panels, etc.).

In an environment where vultures are constantly circling looking for even the slightest blemish that can be blown up and spun into the next Tea Party cause celebre, it's no wonder the administration tries to circle the wagons. When there's a group out there dedicated to humiliating you and embarrassing you as much as possible, and that has shown no aversion to twisting and distorting the facts to suit their own agenda, anyone's natural inclination would be to try to control information.

The fact that the conservative media and Republicans are rampantly distorting facts (or just MSU) to provide attack/fundraising fodder, does not excuse the administration from breaking it's promise. It merely provides some level of insight into the administration's motivation for doing so.

I still expect better from my president, and I'm very disappointed that we haven't received it.
Anonymous
Post 09/09/2014 20:13     Subject: Re:47 Inspector Generals Object to Obama Stonewalling
Same old same old; the most corrupt and lazy president ever.
Anonymous
Post 09/09/2014 18:56     Subject: Re:47 Inspector Generals Object to Obama Stonewalling
Anonymous wrote:Any DCUMers catch the hearings today......."most transparent"


I missed the hearings. Anything to share?
Anonymous
Post 09/09/2014 18:38     Subject: 47 Inspector Generals Object to Obama Stonewalling
Another one of these post?
Anonymous
Post 09/09/2014 18:27     Subject: Re:47 Inspector Generals Object to Obama Stonewalling
Any DCUMers catch the hearings today......."most transparent"
Anonymous
Post 08/21/2014 14:15     Subject: Re:47 Inspector Generals Object to Obama Stonewalling
King Cluster's reign is in full bloom and the idiots who worship him have no clue.
Anonymous
Post 08/20/2014 11:56     Subject: Re:47 Inspector Generals Object to Obama Stonewalling
This is yet another promise broken.
This story, along with the recent letter written by journalists, is demonstrating that the “transparency” of this administration is only a ruse.

http://rt.com/usa/171876-journalsim-censorship-obama-letter/
Anonymous
Post 08/20/2014 11:47     Subject: 47 Inspector Generals Object to Obama Stonewalling
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/08/06/serious-limitations-govt-watchdogs-unite-in-letter-slamming-obama/

The majority of inpector generals have signed onto this letter which is unprecedented. Is this that transparency we heard so much about?