Anonymous wrote:OP here - it just doesn't make sense to me - as I understand it, we would be more likely to get coverage if we were unable to conceive at all on our own. But if we have this genetic condition that causes us to conceive unhealthy babies - who, if born, would require hundreds of thousands of dollars in medical care - they won't help us pay for IVF to ensure that we get a healthy child. It boggles the mind.
If, as stated in your original post, ivf is not covered then you are just as unlikely to get ivf coverage for any reason - fertility, genetic or otherwise.