Anonymous wrote:The OP seems to have very limited ideas of how male friends and female friends talk. I'm a very feminine woman who loves reality TV, shopping, gossip, and doing my nails. One of my best friends is a man I've known since we were in high school, and he likes beer, sports, and occasionally being juvenile.
You know what we talk about when we hang out?
Art. Philosophy. Politics. We talk about life and how we feel and everything we're going through. Shockingly, an intelligent, educated woman and an intelligent, educated man can find plenty of things to talk about that aren't stereotypically gender-specific.
And yes, I know he'd sleep with me if the opportunity arose, but I have many other guy friends and they'd never cross that line or even consider sleeping with me. They're very nice, respectful, and we don't flirt.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a very good friend with one of DH's best friends. Friend and I email and text often about shows or books or movies or funny things we read online. Sometimes we include DH, sometimes we don't - he's not much of a reader, so he doesn't get some of our comments. Not long ago, Friend joined me and some other women for dinner and drinks when we were all out of town at the same location. None of us are available, so I don't think that was a motive.
I guess we didn't seek each other out, but we are certainly really good friends.
Trust me - it might not be a motive for you, but it is for him. OP, 100% certainty that your thread will break along gender lines. Women can have non-sexual relationships with men, but men see relationships with women through a sexual lens, even if they don't intend on sleeping with them. The sexual chemistry is still there.
Then the logical extension of what you've just said is that the religions that insist on women covering themselves so they won't be seen by men (and, thus, make them sexually excited) are correct. You're saying that men are such slaves to their evolutionary urges that they are incapable of seeing a woman without thinking of her in a sexual way.
+1 and pp made me think about every male coworker who has ever made a friendly comment to me was really just trying to hook up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a very good friend with one of DH's best friends. Friend and I email and text often about shows or books or movies or funny things we read online. Sometimes we include DH, sometimes we don't - he's not much of a reader, so he doesn't get some of our comments. Not long ago, Friend joined me and some other women for dinner and drinks when we were all out of town at the same location. None of us are available, so I don't think that was a motive.
I guess we didn't seek each other out, but we are certainly really good friends.
Trust me - it might not be a motive for you, but it is for him. OP, 100% certainty that your thread will break along gender lines. Women can have non-sexual relationships with men, but men see relationships with women through a sexual lens, even if they don't intend on sleeping with them. The sexual chemistry is still there.
Then the logical extension of what you've just said is that the religions that insist on women covering themselves so they won't be seen by men (and, thus, make them sexually excited) are correct. You're saying that men are such slaves to their evolutionary urges that they are incapable of seeing a woman without thinking of her in a sexual way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a very good friend with one of DH's best friends. Friend and I email and text often about shows or books or movies or funny things we read online. Sometimes we include DH, sometimes we don't - he's not much of a reader, so he doesn't get some of our comments. Not long ago, Friend joined me and some other women for dinner and drinks when we were all out of town at the same location. None of us are available, so I don't think that was a motive.
I guess we didn't seek each other out, but we are certainly really good friends.
Trust me - it might not be a motive for you, but it is for him. OP, 100% certainty that your thread will break along gender lines. Women can have non-sexual relationships with men, but men see relationships with women through a sexual lens, even if they don't intend on sleeping with them. The sexual chemistry is still there.
Anonymous wrote:I'm a very good friend with one of DH's best friends. Friend and I email and text often about shows or books or movies or funny things we read online. Sometimes we include DH, sometimes we don't - he's not much of a reader, so he doesn't get some of our comments. Not long ago, Friend joined me and some other women for dinner and drinks when we were all out of town at the same location. None of us are available, so I don't think that was a motive.
I guess we didn't seek each other out, but we are certainly really good friends.
Anonymous wrote:I guess this is a rehash of the old "can men and women ever be just friends" debate. But, I was reading the comments in some threads here talking about how men should value women for something other than sex and reading a blog post about a woman who was mad at a man who didn't find her sexually attractive despite her many laudable nonsexual characteristics.
So, I value my wife and other women for things other than their sexual attractiveness. But, if I'm honest, I have to admit that I wouldn't seek out female companionship much, if at all, if sex were completely off the table. When I was single, I hung out with groups that included women, but part of the draw was the potential for hooking up. Now that I'm married, I value my wife for nonsexual aspects of our relationship, but I never would have bothered with marriage if sex were off the table. I don't seek out social relationships with other women now that I'm married. Because, frankly, given professional and family demands, my social time is limited and I prefer the conversational topics, activities, and humor that my male friends enjoy and women mostly don't seem to. (Typical stuff - beer, sports, crass juvenile humor). And often the topics, activities, and humor I see from the women I encounter in my wife's circle are often deeply uninteresting to me.
I'm not saying men are better than women or vice versa. Just that, given what I personally find entertaining and interesting, if it weren't for sex, I'm not sure I ever would have sought out or maintained female companionship.
Guess I'm just trying to figure out if this makes me a misogynistic monster or if the experience and preferences of others lines up in a similar manner. (Or, perhaps, if women typically enjoy nonsexual guy friends while the reverse isn't typically true.)