Anonymous wrote:Summary:
Dershowitz says:
There's a lot of evidence that AK did it (murdered MK). That doesn't mean necessarily that she is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. He discusses at least 5 significant pieces of evidence. He believes that she probably did it.
We have an extradition treaty with Italy -- they have a pretty good justice system; while it's not perfect, neither is ours. In fact, Italy does a lot better than we do at not sending innocent, poor members of ethnic minorities to jail than we do. He stated that there are thousands of people in jail in this country who were convicted on far less evidence than there is in the Meredith Kercher murder case (against AK).
Dershowitz said he's never seen such a one-sided media presentation by the U.S. media in 50 years practicing law. He says that people say things like: "there's no evidence" and cast aspersions on the Italian legal system that are false. He does not think that AK will be extradited, but says that legally, there's no reason why she shouldn't be. It won't happen, because of political reasons. She has not been subjected to "double jeopardy" in Italy; it's just a different system.
AK is a pretty, young, American with an amazing PR campaign behind her, and people here are not interested in the evidence, because of that, in Dershowitz's opinion.
Above all, says Dershowitz, we should not be holding up AK as a heroine, because she accused an innocent black man (her boss at her part-time job at a pub) of the crime. He was jailed, and it really messed up his life.
I'd like to know the specific evidence he is relying on, because there actually isn't any.