Anonymous wrote:So true. People from this area associate low SES with people of color. Most people live below the poverty line are classified white, but people who live in the DMV bubble seldom encounter that part of America. Talk about distorted perspective.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's difficult to interpret these data, because the top schools are much more likely than others to meet 100% of the need of students from lower income families. So, e.g., only 14% of students at Yale are poor enough to qualify for Pell grants, but since Yale meets 100% need, all of them will be getting substantial financial aid. Students from families making under $30,000 will pay an average $7800 per year to go to Yale. By comparison, 22% of the students at NYU qualify for Pell Grants, but NYU doesn't meet full need, so the average price paid per year for students from families with income under $30,000 is $27,000--an OUTRAGEOUS amount of money that is almost certainly being financed with loans. You can see that by clicking the "net price" tab here:
http://nces.ed.gov/collegenavigator/?q=new+york+university&s=all&id=193900
So I dunno, is NYU doing these poor students any big favor?
Low-income students at Ivies still take the Pell. Elite schools that offer to meet 100% of demonstrated need on the FAFSA without loans add Pells, SEOGs, and any state grants for which a student is eligible into their calculations. So, yes Pells are a good indicator of how many low-income students a school accepts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's difficult to interpret these data, because the top schools are much more likely than others to meet 100% of the need of students from lower income families. So, e.g., only 14% of students at Yale are poor enough to qualify for Pell grants, but since Yale meets 100% need, all of them will be getting substantial financial aid. Students from families making under $30,000 will pay an average $7800 per year to go to Yale. By comparison, 22% of the students at NYU qualify for Pell Grants, but NYU doesn't meet full need, so the average price paid per year for students from families with income under $30,000 is $27,000--an OUTRAGEOUS amount of money that is almost certainly being financed with loans. You can see that by clicking the "net price" tab here:
http://nces.ed.gov/collegenavigator/?q=new+york+university&s=all&id=193900
So I dunno, is NYU doing these poor students any big favor?
Low-income students at Ivies still take the Pell. Elite schools that offer to meet 100% of demonstrated need on the FAFSA without loans add Pells, SEOGs, and any state grants for which a student is eligible into their calculations. So, yes Pells are a good indicator of how many low-income students a school accepts.
Anonymous wrote:It's difficult to interpret these data, because the top schools are much more likely than others to meet 100% of the need of students from lower income families. So, e.g., only 14% of students at Yale are poor enough to qualify for Pell grants, but since Yale meets 100% need, all of them will be getting substantial financial aid. Students from families making under $30,000 will pay an average $7800 per year to go to Yale. By comparison, 22% of the students at NYU qualify for Pell Grants, but NYU doesn't meet full need, so the average price paid per year for students from families with income under $30,000 is $27,000--an OUTRAGEOUS amount of money that is almost certainly being financed with loans. You can see that by clicking the "net price" tab here:
http://nces.ed.gov/collegenavigator/?q=new+york+university&s=all&id=193900
So I dunno, is NYU doing these poor students any big favor?
Anonymous wrote:My sister says that Swarthmore was pretty economically diverse for a top school.