Anonymous wrote:Harvard and Yale are VERY low on the bro scale Princeton would be higher.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It amazes me how obsessed some of y'all are with this. Totally strange.
Why is that strange? My DC wanted to stay far away from any colleges which were "high bro". Frats, LAX, etc. No thanks.
Anonymous wrote:It amazes me how obsessed some of y'all are with this. Totally strange.
Anonymous wrote:Another poster coined the term "bro quotient" defined (by her) as:
"Low bro quotient" = quiet schools with no frats, there are few parties, and where no one cares about either college or professional sports.
What top schools stand out for exceptional low or high bro quotient?
Among Top 25 schools, I'd say Duke, USC, UVA, Vanderbilt and maybe Dartmouth have the highest bro quotient.
Chicago, Cal Tech, MIT, Johns Hopkins are probably lowest.
Sorry, I can't keep up with the definitions. I just referred myself to Urban Dictionary. I'm just old.Anonymous wrote:It is an you're right. OP has chosen to change the definition but the fact remains that 'low-bro' means what it means. Maybe OP should say 'low brow.'Anonymous wrote:Ha. I thought that was a thinly-veiled reference to the fact that Pitt was in urban, diverse, Oakland. (So, high-bro?).
It is an you're right. OP has chosen to change the definition but the fact remains that 'low-bro' means what it means. Maybe OP should say 'low brow.'Anonymous wrote:Ha. I thought that was a thinly-veiled reference to the fact that Pitt was in urban, diverse, Oakland. (So, high-bro?).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ha. I thought that was a thinly-veiled reference to the fact that Pitt was in urban, diverse, Oakland. (So, high-bro?).
No - OP in this thread summarized the intent. An East Coast "bro" would typically be a white male from a suburb like Upper Merion or Mt. Lebanon, PA, Great Neck, NY, Bethesda, MD or Vienna, VA.
Anonymous wrote:Ha. I thought that was a thinly-veiled reference to the fact that Pitt was in urban, diverse, Oakland. (So, high-bro?).