What's really funny is that he's doing exactly what John McCain suggests, and then after he does it, McCain lambastes him for it.

No. In advocating for his release, McCain did say he would first have to know the details of an exchange.

They should have just let him die as a POW. after all he's just a working class American marine. Now if he were the son of a Navy Admiral he might be worth saving. If you don't believe me, just ask Senator John McCain.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is Susan Rice a moron or a liar? Bergdahl was not dying and he certainly didn't serve with honor and distinction.

"Was not dying" - And you know this how? Are you a physician, did you personally evaluate Bergdahl's physical condition?

He looked pretty healthy when he got onto the helicopter. Obama should change his foreign policy over the next 2 years. Every time he has the urge to do something, he should do the opposite. It's the only way to save his presidency.

What's really funny is that he's doing exactly what John McCain suggests, and then after he does it, McCain lambastes him for it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is Susan Rice a moron or a liar? Bergdahl was not dying and he certainly didn't serve with honor and distinction.

"Was not dying" - And you know this how? Are you a physician, did you personally evaluate Bergdahl's physical condition?

He looked pretty healthy when he got onto the helicopter. Obama should change his foreign policy over the next 2 years. Every time he has the urge to do something, he should do the opposite. It's the only way to save his presidency.

Anonymous wrote:Is Susan Rice a moron or a liar? Bergdahl was not dying and he certainly didn't serve with honor and distinction.

"Was not dying" - And you know this how? Are you a physician, did you personally evaluate Bergdahl's physical condition?

She simply has very bad Sunday mornings. The other days of the week are just fine for her.

Anonymous wrote:Yes, we should have left him there to die!

I love playing g-d

Leaving him there is not playing God. 99.9999% of the time I would be all for doing whatever it takes to rescue an American POW, but in this case I just don't see how you can justify the lives lost and now the security risk to save a man who evidence strongly suggests abandoned his post and walked away of his own volition. I feel for his family and friends but at the end of the day, he made a bad decision that was his and his alone.

Either way, it doesn't answer the question of why on Earth Rice said something that everyone plainly knows not to be true - that he was captured in battle. She's not a moron, so all I can come up with is that she was lying, for what reason I'm not entirely sure. I want to believe there's a damned good reason for all of this, but I'm struggling at this point to even imagine what it might be.

Yes, we should have left him there to die!

I love playing g-d

The answer is YES!

Puppet.

Anonymous wrote:Is Susan Rice a moron or a liar? Bergdahl was not dying and he certainly didn't serve with honor and distinction.

Neither. She is plain Evil.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP - moron or liar (Bergdahl)?

This is a trick question because it is both!

Anonymous wrote:OP - moron or liar (Bergdahl)?

This is a trick question because it is both!

OP - moron or liar (Bergdahl)?

Is Susan Rice a moron or a liar? Bergdahl was not dying and he certainly didn't serve with honor and distinction.