Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At the last meeting, DME said she wants more feedback from Wards that had not previously participated. But if there are no more meetings on the schedule, how is that going to occur?
By reaching out to people who she knows already agree with [her] and claiming they speak for Wards 7 and 8?
Anonymous wrote:
At the last meeting, DME said she wants more feedback from Wards that had not previously participated. But if there are no more meetings on the schedule, how is that going to occur?
Anonymous wrote:dcmom wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I really don't see how they can make anything final in September when there will be a new mayor come January.
The Mayor will (likely) still be the Mayor in September. So he can approve the final recommendation (or change it). Of course, a new mayor can approve something else in January. But I think part of the timing is intentional. Boundary changes are necessary but never popular (part of the reason DC hasn't done it for almost 40 years). So Gray can approve something, and Mayor Bowser or Catania can blame him but say it is a done deal now.
I agree with PP's analysis. There will be significant inertia against making a change to the September plan after the November election concludes. Even if the new mayor disagrees with aspects of the September plan, it's hard to see how he/she would want to wade into the battle and piss lots of people off, when he/she can more easily blame it on the former administration. Seems the new mayor will have other more pressing issues. People need to speak now, or be prepared to live with whatever the DME proposes.
At the last meeting, DME said she wants more feedback from Wards that had not previously participated. But if there are no more meetings on the schedule, how is that going to occur?
I think they can make the boundary changes, and maybe the OOB set-aside, but I would be really surprised if they moved forward with A or C and the new Mayor didn't roll it back come January. However, I've lived in DC long enough that I shouldn't be surprised when anything happens.
I agree. But with both Catania and Bowser (sort of) ruling out options A or C, I cannot see the advisory committee recommending one of those options. I agree that we could be wrong, or that some element of A or C creeps into the proposal, but I am doubtful.
dcmom wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I really don't see how they can make anything final in September when there will be a new mayor come January.
The Mayor will (likely) still be the Mayor in September. So he can approve the final recommendation (or change it). Of course, a new mayor can approve something else in January. But I think part of the timing is intentional. Boundary changes are necessary but never popular (part of the reason DC hasn't done it for almost 40 years). So Gray can approve something, and Mayor Bowser or Catania can blame him but say it is a done deal now.
I agree with PP's analysis. There will be significant inertia against making a change to the September plan after the November election concludes. Even if the new mayor disagrees with aspects of the September plan, it's hard to see how he/she would want to wade into the battle and piss lots of people off, when he/she can more easily blame it on the former administration. Seems the new mayor will have other more pressing issues. People need to speak now, or be prepared to live with whatever the DME proposes.
At the last meeting, DME said she wants more feedback from Wards that had not previously participated. But if there are no more meetings on the schedule, how is that going to occur?
I think they can make the boundary changes, and maybe the OOB set-aside, but I would be really surprised if they moved forward with A or C and the new Mayor didn't roll it back come January. However, I've lived in DC long enough that I shouldn't be surprised when anything happens.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I really don't see how they can make anything final in September when there will be a new mayor come January.
The Mayor will (likely) still be the Mayor in September. So he can approve the final recommendation (or change it). Of course, a new mayor can approve something else in January. But I think part of the timing is intentional. Boundary changes are necessary but never popular (part of the reason DC hasn't done it for almost 40 years). So Gray can approve something, and Mayor Bowser or Catania can blame him but say it is a done deal now.
I agree with PP's analysis. There will be significant inertia against making a change to the September plan after the November election concludes. Even if the new mayor disagrees with aspects of the September plan, it's hard to see how he/she would want to wade into the battle and piss lots of people off, when he/she can more easily blame it on the former administration. Seems the new mayor will have other more pressing issues. People need to speak now, or be prepared to live with whatever the DME proposes.
At the last meeting, DME said she wants more feedback from Wards that had not previously participated. But if there are no more meetings on the schedule, how is that going to occur?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I really don't see how they can make anything final in September when there will be a new mayor come January.
The Mayor will (likely) still be the Mayor in September. So he can approve the final recommendation (or change it). Of course, a new mayor can approve something else in January. But I think part of the timing is intentional. Boundary changes are necessary but never popular (part of the reason DC hasn't done it for almost 40 years). So Gray can approve something, and Mayor Bowser or Catania can blame him but say it is a done deal now.
Anonymous wrote:I really don't see how they can make anything final in September when there will be a new mayor come January.
Anonymous wrote:Are the Advisory Committee meetings open? Or closed to the public?
Anonymous wrote:I don't see any more specific events listed on the DME calendar where citizens can comment. http://dme.dc.gov/book/student-assignment-and-school-boundaries-review-process/getting-involved-and-timeline But I know that at the last open meeting, the DME indicated her office wants to encourage more feedback. Is anyone aware of any upcoming events not advertised on the DME site?
Also, as I read the full-program timeline -- http://dme.dc.gov/node/734972 -- it looks like DME is planning to release a comprehensive and final proposal in May, which will be discussed over the summer and (absent tweaks) imposed as a final plan in September. If people have comments, it seems now is the time to submit them, because the next proposal will be pretty close to final.