Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I don't plan to purchase much jewelry but whatever I do purchase will be high end (Tiffany's, Cartier, Rolex and such) so that my daughters are likely to be interested in it.
and you teach your daughters that brands rather than sentimental value is what is important. great.... (sigh...)
Anonymous wrote:
I don't plan to purchase much jewelry but whatever I do purchase will be high end (Tiffany's, Cartier, Rolex and such) so that my daughters are likely to be interested in it.
Anonymous wrote:I don't think it is elegant enough to justify the $40,000 cost.
Anonymous wrote:I bought in the $2000 range at Tiffany's and plan to do it again. I don't regret it for a second. No, it's not in the range you are discussing, by I was a PhD student back then so it was probably relatively less affordable. Justifications:
1) it retains significant portion of its value
2) virtually no expense to maintain (like a vacation home)
3) i can give it to my daughters so it will remind them of me
4) it's very portable, as somebody mentioned
5) i love wearing it, it makes every outfit better
I don't plan to purchase much jewelry but whatever I do purchase will be high end (Tiffany's, Cartier, Rolex and such) so that my daughters are likely to be interested in it.
Anonymous wrote:That's a beautiful piece. I haven't purchased anything in that range, but Cartier is a brand with some resale value, which is something that I do keep in mind when I buy jewelry.
It looks heavy. Once I bought a big Tiffany Atlas ring - but after wearing it a bit, I found it to be too big to be comfortable, so it sits in my jewelry box. If you plan to wear it regularly, you might want to make sure it feels okay.
It's difficult to justify. Here's something though - it won't depreciate to zero like a boat or a sports car.
And if you ever need to bribe someone at a border or something to save your life, it's a very portable asset.
Very good point about the bribery. I do like my adventures