Anonymous wrote:OP, I'm trying to figure out which part of this is the best demonstration that you have WAY too much time on your hands, the fact that you actually made an appt. with the AART? the fact that you actually analyzed and critiqued your child's work samples? Or the fact that you posted it all here like this nonsense matters. I recommend you get a job or a find a hobby. If this is the type of micromanaging you do for an 8 year old, you'll drive yourself crazy by college. Have some faith in your kid and the system. sounds like they'll both do fine on their own.
Anonymous wrote:OP, I'm trying to figure out which part of this is the best demonstration that you have WAY too much time on your hands, the fact that you actually made an appt. with the AART? the fact that you actually analyzed and critiqued your child's work samples? Or the fact that you posted it all here like this nonsense matters. I recommend you get a job or a find a hobby. If this is the type of micromanaging you do for an 8 year old, you'll drive yourself crazy by college. Have some faith in your kid and the system. sounds like they'll both do fine on their own.
Anonymous wrote:All I can tell you is the file I saw from our AART is that it was front to back, with everything.
Anonymous wrote:In the pool + GBRS of 16.
It doesn't matter what pieces of work are selected. Even if they were mad scribblings.
The kid is automatically in.
Anonymous wrote:Interesting. I don't think parents can do front and back when submitting work samples. It's good in a way they can give more than just 2. Seemed odd that parents could submit more than the school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What was your child's GBRS? how were the commentaries?
16 and excellent. (I was very surprised it was that high, to be honest). I am only stating that the work samples, to me, were weak and if the school thinks those are the best he can do, well that's pretty sad. I'm NOT saying my kid is a genius, but I do not think the work samples accurately reflect a snapshot of him. Nothing unique or interesting about them except for maybe one of the few pieces.
The school can turn in TWO pieces- so how can "one of the few pieces" be good?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What was your child's GBRS? how were the commentaries?
16 and excellent. (I was very surprised it was that high, to be honest). I am only stating that the work samples, to me, were weak and if the school thinks those are the best he can do, well that's pretty sad. I'm NOT saying my kid is a genius, but I do not think the work samples accurately reflect a snapshot of him. Nothing unique or interesting about them except for maybe one of the few pieces.
Anonymous wrote:What was your child's GBRS? how were the commentaries?