Anonymous wrote:
Jeff, what kind of research would you like t share on how the non-profit Breanne says she started " sustainable U" is funded. Any connection with office of planning , "Sustainable DC"?
Second , what can you share about the PR firm Breanne works for. Who are their otehr clients. Any business interests there ?
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was not aware of her connections to developers. I have met her and yes, she seems abrasive.
I understand that Graham has had questionable dealings, but if Nadeau is truly being bankrolled by developers, I have concerns that she would just turn around and do the same.
I'm not in love with Graham, but he does constituent services very well, and that's important in a city council member. If you can't even survive as an ANC rep, I have to question whether you can do an effective job at that as a council member.
But, obviously Nadeau has some strong supporters out there who see something they like. I guess I'll be reading over her website again to see if I can figure it out.
I just looked through Nadeau's and Graham's campaign finance reports. I think the alleged connection of Nadeau is a figment of the earlier poster's imagination, if not an outright lie. I didn't see any contributions to Nadeau from developers. I supposed there could have been some individual contributions from developers whose names I didn't recognize, but I'm familiar with many, if not most, of the developer LLCs and none of them gave her any money. In contrast, Graham's report was full of developer contributions including:
McCullough Construction LLC
Capital Construction Enterprises, INC
2436 18th Street Associates LP
Congressional North Associ LP
DC General Construction Inc
Its My Real Estate LLC
Jair Lynch
LEVEL 2 DEVELOPMENT LLC
This list may include some who are, strictly speaking, not developers. But, they are all involved in development. Moreover, Graham has received a ton of money from companies connected to gas and petroleum.
You can go to ocf.dc.gov yourself and check out the reports. No need to take my word for it (or the word of an anonymous poster who doesn't like the "girl" candidate).
Anonymous wrote:I was not aware of her connections to developers. I have met her and yes, she seems abrasive.
I understand that Graham has had questionable dealings, but if Nadeau is truly being bankrolled by developers, I have concerns that she would just turn around and do the same.
I'm not in love with Graham, but he does constituent services very well, and that's important in a city council member. If you can't even survive as an ANC rep, I have to question whether you can do an effective job at that as a council member.
But, obviously Nadeau has some strong supporters out there who see something they like. I guess I'll be reading over her website again to see if I can figure it out.
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ok, so innate corruption (Graham) is better than a legally funded campaign?
Graham gets, or got the same money before.
Let's examine that accusation> so, what happened is : Graham's Chief of Staff , soemone he trusted and had no reason to doubt, sent a bribe his way and Graham did what,
wait….he didn't accept it, not even from his own chief of staff , who is now the one in jail.
Explain to me how that means Breanne is competent to lead Ward one. The girl is darn annoying as hell, No one , I mean no one is going to even take her call. Ward one will become something for developers to step on on the way to the bank.
Oops.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ok, so innate corruption (Graham) is better than a legally funded campaign?
Graham gets, or got the same money before.
Let's examine that accusation> so, what happened is : Graham's Chief of Staff , soemone he trusted and had no reason to doubt, sent a bribe his way and Graham did what,
wait….he didn't accept it, not even from his own chief of staff , who is now the one in jail.
Explain to me how that means Breanne is competent to lead Ward one. The girl is darn annoying as hell, No one , I mean no one is going to even take her call. Ward one will become something for developers to step on on the way to the bank.
Anonymous wrote:Ok, so innate corruption (Graham) is better than a legally funded campaign?
Graham gets, or got the same money before.