Anonymous wrote:I was told it is also based on teacher recs and that people can and do test prep their kids. My point is just that if a kid is really gifted, tests high but is a goof off or not the best student, and another student who is a great student but not gifted gets a high score and good recs, then they get into a gifted program over a gifted student. I am NOT saying I am against rewarding being a good student. Not at all, but don't put them in a gifted program for working hard. I am surgeon now, and was one of those really hard working students who did not test as gifted but did well in honors and A.P. course work. I had friends who were gifted, who did not always get enough out of honors course work, one I know who was doing very poorly because he was so bored, and his gifted IEP did much to serve him. I would much rather see honors track or something like that, based on grades and work, and then actual gifted IEPs for gifted kids, regardless of their grades. That is just how I feel about it. We are very new to the state and still learning the ropes. I don't know that I would want my son in a gifted center, he does not do well with pressure, but since he is gifted I would like to see those needs served. That is all...
Teacher recs are a factor, but the main/primary driver is the test.
Like any competitive-entry program, the application and entry system is not perfect, but it works.
Both of my kids have gone through the Center program, magnet middle programs, and are now in magnet high schools. The Center is not "pressured." It provides enriched instruction and content.