jsteele
02/26/2014 20:27
Subject: Re:jeff the HIV thread is not explicit sex material
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:The issue with that thread is that it dealt specifically with sex and a sexually transmitted disease. I'm getting paranoid about Google and potentially violating their policies. Even though that thread didn't have explicit language, it appears to violate Google's current policies regarding adult content. I am even getting worried about the TTC and infertility discussions.
sad,b/c that means that medical information will/can be considered explicit. Just wanted more folks to think think think about testing.
It's frustrating to me as well. But, this is symptomatic of the controversies surround sexual and reproductive health. Advertisers don't want to touch the issues.
Anonymous
02/26/2014 20:25
Subject: Re:jeff the HIV thread is not explicit sex material
jsteele wrote:The issue with that thread is that it dealt specifically with sex and a sexually transmitted disease. I'm getting paranoid about Google and potentially violating their policies. Even though that thread didn't have explicit language, it appears to violate Google's current policies regarding adult content. I am even getting worried about the TTC and infertility discussions.
sad,b/c that means that medical information will/can be considered explicit. Just wanted more folks to think think think about testing.
jsteele
02/26/2014 17:55
Subject: Re:jeff the HIV thread is not explicit sex material
The issue with that thread is that it dealt specifically with sex and a sexually transmitted disease. I'm getting paranoid about Google and potentially violating their policies. Even though that thread didn't have explicit language, it appears to violate Google's current policies regarding adult content. I am even getting worried about the TTC and infertility discussions.
Anonymous
02/26/2014 17:05
Subject: jeff the HIV thread is not explicit sex material
maybe relationship non explicit, but not explicit.