Anonymous
Post 02/19/2014 11:48     Subject: Recorded meeting

Anonymous wrote:What did your boss say about it? That it was ok? That your boss would talk to the other employee? Something isn't adding up here


yeah this is what I"m not understanding. So your boss knows, told you...and now what? Is your boss going to reprimand the employee? Put out a statement saying under no circumstances should meetings be recorded without the consent of everyone in the meeting? This story sounds like it is missing a big chunk of information.
Anonymous
Post 02/19/2014 11:42     Subject: Recorded meeting

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:first off, the employee committed a crime.


Yep. Grounds for dismissal.


Its only a crime if all parties didn't know/agree to it.
OP didn't specify.


it's pretty clear from the OP that the employee did this surreptitiously and without OP's knowledge. do you think OP would have gone through with the conversation if the employee, at the start, said "hey, FYI. i am taping this. okay, we can start now"?
Anonymous
Post 02/17/2014 16:24     Subject: Recorded meeting

What did your boss say about it? That it was ok? That your boss would talk to the other employee? Something isn't adding up here
Anonymous
Post 02/17/2014 16:23     Subject: Re:Recorded meeting

Proof? Or word of mouth? You file a complaint and the employee will delete it on the phone. Nothing will then come of it.
Anonymous
Post 02/17/2014 16:21     Subject: Recorded meeting

What if you are wrong?
Anonymous
Post 02/17/2014 15:43     Subject: Recorded meeting

Does Linda Tripp work for you?
Anonymous
Post 02/17/2014 15:03     Subject: Recorded meeting

Anonymous wrote:Wait...OP, are you the one who recorded your boss?


Nope, i was told the employee recorded me with her phone.
Anonymous
Post 02/17/2014 11:30     Subject: Recorded meeting

See below:
Twelve states currently require that all parties consent to the recording: California,[20] Connecticut,[21] Florida,[22] Hawaii (in general a one-party state, but requires two-party consent if the recording device is installed in a private place),[21] Illinois (debated, see next section), Maryland,[23] Massachusetts,[21] Montana[24] (requires notification only), Nevada,[21] New Hampshire,[25] Pennsylvania,[26] and Washington.[27] However, three of the above states that permission is given if any of the parties announces that they will be recording the call in a reasonable manner if the recording contains that announcement.
Anonymous
Post 02/17/2014 10:33     Subject: Recorded meeting

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:first off, the employee committed a crime.


Yep. Grounds for dismissal.


Its only a crime if all parties didn't know/agree to it.
OP didn't specify.
Anonymous
Post 02/17/2014 10:27     Subject: Recorded meeting

Wait...OP, are you the one who recorded your boss?
Anonymous
Post 02/17/2014 10:13     Subject: Recorded meeting

Anonymous wrote:first off, the employee committed a crime.


Yep. Grounds for dismissal.
Anonymous
Post 02/17/2014 09:53     Subject: Recorded meeting

first off, the employee committed a crime.
Anonymous
Post 02/16/2014 21:56     Subject: Recorded meeting

Previous discussions with my boss. She plays victim anytime she is asked to do something.
Anonymous
Post 02/16/2014 21:48     Subject: Recorded meeting

Anonymous wrote:If one of the employees you supervise recorded a meeting you held, in attempt to get you in trouble, what would you do? Nothing said during the meeting would warrant a reprimand. Just wondering how I should address it. Fwiw, we are in Maryland.


Hmm well how do you know that was the specific purpose?
Anonymous
Post 02/16/2014 21:46     Subject: Recorded meeting

If one of the employees you supervise recorded a meeting you held, in attempt to get you in trouble, what would you do? Nothing said during the meeting would warrant a reprimand. Just wondering how I should address it. Fwiw, we are in Maryland.