Anonymous wrote:Many older AA and Hispanic people who bought there when it was undesirable were priced out of the new market
How do you get priced out of something you already bought?
Anonymous wrote:Weird. I'm a black person who shops at TJ's and I'm never the only one there
Anonymous wrote:Many older AA and Hispanic people who bought there when it was undesirable were priced out of the new market
How do you get priced out of something you already bought?
Many older AA and Hispanic people who bought there when it was undesirable were priced out of the new market
Anonymous wrote:Quote from the article:
PAALF had called for the city to construct affordable housing on the vacant lot (in conjunction with the Trader Joe’s project), among other demands for City Hall. They also asked the PDC to provide a modest small business assistance to existing shops and restaurants in a nearby shopping center called Vanport Plaza. In January -- in what was something of an unprecedented move -- PDC officials admitted that in the past they had undertaken projects that uprooted black communities, but nonetheless rejected the PAALF’s demand for affordable housing to form part of the comprehensive Trader Joe’s deal.
It's not about shopping there though. It's about the effect TJ will have in their neighborhood.Anonymous wrote:Weird. I'm a black person who shops at TJ's and I'm never the only one there
+1Anonymous wrote:Yes, these folks' concerns are real. I don't know what the answer is either but it is hardly "idiotic" as the pp above said to be worried.Anonymous wrote:It's a tricky dilemma - putting desirable businesses in communities with a lower SEC will bring economic vitality to those areas, and uplift the neighborhood - but they will also raise neighborhood prices, so those people who will no longer be able to afford living in those neighborhoods, will face no choice but have to move.
Gentrification is a tricky thing, and I'm not sure what the solution is.
Yes, these folks' concerns are real. I don't know what the answer is either but it is hardly "idiotic" as the pp above said to be worried.Anonymous wrote:It's a tricky dilemma - putting desirable businesses in communities with a lower SEC will bring economic vitality to those areas, and uplift the neighborhood - but they will also raise neighborhood prices, so those people who will no longer be able to afford living in those neighborhoods, will face no choice but have to move.
Gentrification is a tricky thing, and I'm not sure what the solution is.