Anonymous wrote:I know but the issue was at what point the fees outweigh the tax benefit
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you live in DC, the state tax benefits far outweigh the extra income from Utah's plan.
There's also a thread discussing this issue in some detail. I think the short version is that DC is better if you're investing a smaller sum of money (e.g. under $4,000 per year) but that other states are better if you're investing a larger sum. And neither option was as good as putting it into DC and then transferring it.
Anonymous wrote:If you live in DC, the state tax benefits far outweigh the extra income from Utah's plan.
Anonymous wrote:Utah or Virginia.