Anonymous wrote:I was going to pipe in about Tools of the Mind too. I've seen it used very successfully at a few different schools now.
Reggio and Montessori definitely have to be the right fit for the kid and the family.
Expeditionary is great for kids who like to get out and about but some are more sedentary.
I agree that sometimes the best program is one that is a combination of approaches, well thought out and well done.
Anonymous wrote:My child is currently in a Montessori school. It's true that there is more "alone" work time but I've seen it happen more by choice (e.g. kid is focused on their work). I have a chatty, extroverted child who chooses group work.
The teachers spend a lot of one-on-one time with each kid. OP, you heard differently? The one-on-one time is one of the things I like most about Montessori. I feel that the teacher really understands my kid and my kid gets a lot of individual attention.
Anonymous wrote:Montessori is probably different in that its methods are so rigid (and I also did not consider it for my child), but as for the other styles . . . I had a similar Q when we were looking at preschools and a well-respected teacher at our public PS told me that the best PS teachers/programs take the best of all those models. It would not surprise me if there is a lot of overlap in the play-based models for early childhood education and there is as much variation between and among teachers as there is among curricula. As an example, we have a standard curriculum at my child's preschool but the way it is implemented by the different teachers is extremely different. So I'd just tour the schools (during the school day) and see which ones you are most comfortable with.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thanks. OP here, and I do think that Reggio would work better for my daughter. I loved SWS when I visited--that is likely our top choice. I think the rigidity of Montessori would not work well for her. My understanding is that there is a correct way to use the Montessori materials, and if children want to use them a different way, the teacher interrupts and shows the right way. I think that could work for some kids who really like to work in an ordered way, but my toddler is not like that.
The more that I read about Reggio, the more it sounds similar to schools that have expeditionary learning (like Bridges, Cap City, Two Rivers, and Mundo Verde). For those who have experience with both types of schools, does that sound right?
I did find a few online resources, in case anyone is looking more at how they are distinguished. Some of the articles also contain info on Waldorf, which is not offered (to my knowledge) in DCPS/charters. See links below.
http://www.pbs.org/parents/education/going-to-school/choosing/comparing-preschool-philosophies-montessori-waldorf-and-more/
http://www.earlychildhoodnews.com/earlychildhood/article_view.aspx?ArticleID=367
http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v4n1/edwards.html
Thanks again to PPs for your helpful posts!
There's a lot of heresay on here about how Montessori is supposed to work. You should probably sit in on a few sessions if you can to get a legitimate understanding. My DC is at LAMB and it has been a fantastic experience. She has never once been told "the correct way" to use the materials, etc...> I would recommend you try to lottery in. The odds of admission are slim, but that's how we got in. GL
Anonymous wrote:Thanks. OP here, and I do think that Reggio would work better for my daughter. I loved SWS when I visited--that is likely our top choice. I think the rigidity of Montessori would not work well for her. My understanding is that there is a correct way to use the Montessori materials, and if children want to use them a different way, the teacher interrupts and shows the right way. I think that could work for some kids who really like to work in an ordered way, but my toddler is not like that.
The more that I read about Reggio, the more it sounds similar to schools that have expeditionary learning (like Bridges, Cap City, Two Rivers, and Mundo Verde). For those who have experience with both types of schools, does that sound right?
I did find a few online resources, in case anyone is looking more at how they are distinguished. Some of the articles also contain info on Waldorf, which is not offered (to my knowledge) in DCPS/charters. See links below.
http://www.pbs.org/parents/education/going-to-school/choosing/comparing-preschool-philosophies-montessori-waldorf-and-more/
http://www.earlychildhoodnews.com/earlychildhood/article_view.aspx?ArticleID=367
http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v4n1/edwards.html
Thanks again to PPs for your helpful posts!
Anonymous wrote:Logan Montessori isn't that great. If I were looking at applying to preschools for my kids, I would not rank it high (unless I lived really close).
SWS (Reggio) gets great reviews.
I think more important than philosophy is getting into a well run school with great teachers and a good peer group, preferably though at least 5th.