Anonymous wrote:hmmm...good point. I'm the PP who came up with the theory on how the lottery will work and you're right...it's not clear how the waitlist piece would then work...we'll it's clear how it would work for your top choice...but for the 11 other schools that you ranked lower, not so much. Yeah, I don't know. Again, this shouldn't be a guessing game. This is a lottery that our taxes fund...we should be allowed to understand the methodology.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That is NOT the method. Please do not continue to spread this misinformation. The methodology is the same as last year.
1. 6 choices vs. 12
2. Charters are included
Two ways the methodology differs.
Anonymous wrote:That is NOT the method. Please do not continue to spread this misinformation. The methodology is the same as last year.
Anonymous wrote:That is NOT the method. Please do not continue to spread this misinformation. The methodology is the same as last year.
Anonymous wrote:That is NOT the method. Please do not continue to spread this misinformation. The methodology is the same as last year.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, agree that this algorithm should NOT be some sort of state secret. And I do not agree that it will be the same method as last year.
What I suspect is the plan is that they will take the full number of lottery applicants for a particular grade and spit out the numbers once (so, let's say 5000 applicants for one grade...they "shake the hat" and pull out the numbers ordering them as they are pulled--yes, I realize a computer will do this and it's not on slips of paper). Then, they go down that list of 5000 kids, placing children with any preference first, after that they start "matching" children with no preference with their most preferred schools).
So let's say applicant #3500 was actually sorted at #10 in the lottery. That child will have a very good shot at getting in his/her top or 2nd choice (if there were any spots at those schools after giving all the "preference kids" theirs). Conversely, let's say applicant #5 got ranked at #4500 in the lottery pull...that kid has very little chance in getting in at any of his/her top schools (assuming those schools are at all popular).
Anyway, this is admittedly a total guess, but it's all I can come up with based on the limited explanation that we've all received. Why oh why can't they just explain it very simply?
Anonymous wrote:Yes, agree that this algorithm should NOT be some sort of state secret. And I do not agree that it will be the same method as last year.
What I suspect is the plan is that they will take the full number of lottery applicants for a particular grade and spit out the numbers once (so, let's say 5000 applicants for one grade...they "shake the hat" and pull out the numbers ordering them as they are pulled--yes, I realize a computer will do this and it's not on slips of paper). Then, they go down that list of 5000 kids, placing children with any preference first, after that they start "matching" children with no preference with their most preferred schools).
So let's say applicant #3500 was actually sorted at #10 in the lottery. That child will have a very good shot at getting in his/her top or 2nd choice (if there were any spots at those schools after giving all the "preference kids" theirs). Conversely, let's say applicant #5 got ranked at #4500 in the lottery pull...that kid has very little chance in getting in at any of his/her top schools (assuming those schools are at all popular).
Anyway, this is admittedly a total guess, but it's all I can come up with based on the limited explanation that we've all received. Why oh why can't they just explain it very simply?
Anonymous wrote:It is the same method as last year, only with more schools. Think of it as mini-lotteries for each school, then a sorting process that gives you your highest ranked spot and puts you on the waiting list for any school you ranked higher.