Anonymous wrote:Don't list anyone:
"The honor of your presence
is requested at the marriage of
Heather Marie Smith
to Michael Francis Jacobson
Saturday, the seventeenth of May
two thousand and eight
at half past four in the afternoon"
I really don't get this -- I really don't understand parents who give gifts with strings. I was married late 30's and we paid for most of the wedding, but what our parents contributed -- they did so without strings. here is what we can do -- end of story. Why do people do this to their kids, who cares what the invite says, who cares if your friends don't get invited. People need to grow up. Best of luck OP -- I wish you were in the position to tell them no - thanks -- ur cash not needed.
Anonymous wrote:I think the issue is more that OP's parents want to be the only set listed. If it was as simple as putting both sets of parents, I'm sure OP would've done that.
If your parents are paying around 50%, they are 50% hosts. You might have to do the invitations behind their back if they are insisting on being the sole parents listed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"You might have to do the invitations behind their back if they are insisting on being the sole parents listed. "
Bad idea that could easily backfire.
Ok then what's your suggestion? She can't list both sets because her parents want to be listed. Yet they aren't the sole hosts.
Anonymous wrote:"You might have to do the invitations behind their back if they are insisting on being the sole parents listed. "
Bad idea that could easily backfire.
Anonymous wrote:wow. I thought you just put daughter of XX, son of XX on the invitations no matter who was "PAYING".
I didn't think it had anything to do with paying.