Anonymous wrote:Just because suburban is in network does not mean that all surgeons and anesthesiologists are. You have a PPO not an HMO. An HMO would cover all involved if the facility was in network. You need to read the manual, I believed that I read that you can state your circumstances for an appeal - meaning , you had no choice but to use the doctors on call. Asides from the balance billed by the out of network docs, it sounds like BCBS is providing the correct coverage for your Standard plan.
Have you had experience with this? I'm not OP, but I'm considering switching from an hmo (fed plan) to BCBS PPO Basic. And this is the one thing keeping me from making the leap.
(sorry, OP, not trying to hijack your thread). But every time I see discussions of fed plans, everyone seems happy with BCBS Basic (federal). But then I saw OP's thread, and it got me worried.
Even though I've had an HMO, I've never had emergency surgery. My problem with the HMO has been that they find a reason not to cover procedures, even when they pre-authorized them. And I have to argue back and forth to get it covered. And I hate that.
But I always have felt safe with an HMO b/c Maryland has some legal restrictions against balance billing with hmo and covered procedures. But I've never really heard if anyone has had any experience with this.
All of the fed HMO rates seem really high, except for Carefirst POS option, but I can't tell if that *counts* as an HMO, so it might not have the same protections. I'd love to reduce my premiums with BCBS Basic, but I'm afraid of both the possibility that they won't cover out of network emergency stuff (even though they are supposed to cover emergency stuff) and the balance billing issue.
I wish people would come forward if they had either issues similar to OP with BCBS Standard PPO or, worse, not having emergency stuff covered at all under BCBS Basic PPO.
Sorry for the long post. I've posted a few times on different threads (and even started threads) on this topic, because it is really one that keeps me up at night. I might be TTC soon after a recent miscarriage. And if I'm going to have a baby next year, I don't want to take any chances that any possible emergency NICU stuff won't be covered or will result in enormous balance billing issues.
Thanks, OP, for letting me borrow your thread. I really hope you're able to get them to reduce the bill. This balance billing issue as well as emergency providers who don't take insurance is really something that needs more attention from our representatives. I don't think it was dealt with in all of the ACA stuff. And as important as I think it is to get more people insured, that doesn't do much good if even the insured can be slammed with unexpected huge bills in situations where they had no choice in the provider or procedure being done.