Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I do feel sorry for this young woman - she had no idea what a disaster the roll out would be. I also find it interesting that HHS chose to put a person on the homepage who is not a citizen. You just cannot make this stuff up.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/exclusive-obamacares-mystery-woman-victim-cyberbullies/story?id=20868617

I find it odd that conservatives would attack a photo model. While wing nuts are not known for their keen ability to separate fact from fiction, according to this site she could not possibly be a Democrat because she is attractive and we are all apparently ugly.

Yeah, conservatives really are as dumb as wet toast. It's amazing how irrational chronic hatred makes you. I hear the clip-art used in a DNC press release is now receiving death threats. Too dumb for words.

And yet here you are spewing them...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I do feel sorry for this young woman - she had no idea what a disaster the roll out would be. I also find it interesting that HHS chose to put a person on the homepage who is not a citizen. You just cannot make this stuff up.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/exclusive-obamacares-mystery-woman-victim-cyberbullies/story?id=20868617

I find it odd that conservatives would attack a photo model. While wing nuts are not known for their keen ability to separate fact from fiction, according to this site she could not possibly be a Democrat because she is attractive and we are all apparently ugly.

Yeah, conservatives really are as dumb as wet toast. It's amazing how irrational chronic hatred makes you. I hear the clip-art used in a DNC press release is now receiving death threats. Too dumb for words.

Anonymous wrote:I find the irony stunning - a picture of a person who is not a citizen featured prominently on a website and not eligible for the program the website is promoting.

That's odd. You think that legal residents cannot buy health insurance????

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was surprised they didn't have someone hotter as the photo model.

she is super hot. Love Colombians. I'd enroll in her plan any day ....

I like Colombians as well...she is not a hot Colombian. I would like to post hot Colombian mamis on here, but I don't want to do so while eating lunch at work.

This is really a non-story, but I do think she is a very attractive young lady.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find the irony stunning - a picture of a person who is not a citizen featured prominently on a website and not eligible for the program the website is promoting.

Why? She is a model/stock image. Do you really think most models that you see in advertisements have anything to do with the product their image is being used to sell or promote? Do you normally try and connect the person in the image to the product?

Most models in advertisements were not paid with tax payer money......

Anonymous wrote:I find the irony stunning - a picture of a person who is not a citizen featured prominently on a website and not eligible for the program the website is promoting.

Why? She is a model/stock image. Do you really think most models that you see in advertisements have anything to do with the product their image is being used to sell or promote? Do you normally try and connect the person in the image to the product?

I find the irony stunning - a picture of a person who is not a citizen featured prominently on a website and not eligible for the program the website is promoting.

Anonymous wrote:I was surprised they didn't have someone hotter as the photo model.

she is super hot. Love Colombians. I'd enroll in her plan any day ....

I was surprised they didn't have someone hotter as the photo model.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I do feel sorry for this young woman - she had no idea what a disaster the roll out would be. I also find it interesting that HHS chose to put a person on the homepage who is not a citizen. You just cannot make this stuff up.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/exclusive-obamacares-mystery-woman-victim-cyberbullies/story?id=20868617

I find it odd that conservatives would attack a photo model. While wing nuts are not known for their keen ability to separate fact from fiction, according to this site she could not possibly be a Democrat because she is attractive and we are all apparently ugly.

Conservatives? I must have missed that part in the article. Seems to me that the outrage about this website is totally bipartisan...... Nice try, though.

I think it was odd she was nevefr paid for her modeling services - or paid with a family photograph package? very strange.

Even odder that people associated her face with any glitches or negativity towards the website / Obamacare. Did anyone really think the model advertised had anything to do with the glitches?

I can see why she wanted her face off of there and I am glad it is gone for her sake but this is an odd story all around.

I still don't get the part where she 'offered" her picture in exchange for photos......kind of odd.

Anonymous wrote:I do feel sorry for this young woman - she had no idea what a disaster the roll out would be. I also find it interesting that HHS chose to put a person on the homepage who is not a citizen. You just cannot make this stuff up.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/exclusive-obamacares-mystery-woman-victim-cyberbullies/story?id=20868617

I find it odd that conservatives would attack a photo model. While wing nuts are not known for their keen ability to separate fact from fiction, according to this site she could not possibly be a Democrat because she is attractive and we are all apparently ugly.

I do feel sorry for this young woman - she had no idea what a disaster the roll out would be. I also find it interesting that HHS chose to put a person on the homepage who is not a citizen. You just cannot make this stuff up.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/exclusive-obamacares-mystery-woman-victim-cyberbullies/story?id=20868617