Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. This is why so many parents are dissatisfied.
Really, because there is a zillion long thread about how it is too hard and forcing first graders and kindergarteners to hate school and to drop out and become meth heads.
My god, people.
I cannot keep things straight. There are post bitching that common core is too hard and now a post about how it's too simple.
This all leads me to believe that if you are against it, you are against it and are going to find something to bitch about without really looking at it.
Anonymous wrote:Remember that common core encompasses more than just the children of two college/advanced degree families. There are tons of kids from less privileged backgrounds who absolutely have not had exposure enough to be able to do this.
Anonymous wrote:Really, do you all have a budding genius or go to 5 years of preschool or something? My dd went to part-time preschool for 3 years, and she can now reliably count to 20 or 30, but she is not able to count to 100 by 1's and 10's yet. She certainly didn't show up to K with that ability. Do you want your K student to be doing calculus or something? You know some kids that are very advance academically have other issues such as autism. [/quote
Are you serious? No, I don't want my K student to be doing calculus or something.How is counting to 100 to much by the end of K? He could count 'til 20 in Spanish in Pre-K as well as in English.He he not academically advanced or behind, nor does he have an autism or any other -ism.
Anonymous wrote:My kid just started K this year and can count to 100 already. Maybe that is the minimum requirement?
I used to volunteer in her preschool class and I'd say that most of those kids were able to count to 100 also.
Anonymous wrote:OP - that may be one of their goals for K math - but it likely isn't the only goal. I know they are working on other things in our DD's K class that are math related.
Anonymous wrote:No. This is why so many parents are dissatisfied.