Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP here.
I am an expert in my field. I do a lot of data analysis. When understanding the data, there is signal and there is noise. In the case of using the CogAT as an IQ test, there are multiple noise sources. The signal is IQ. Noise includes test prep, and many other factors, which include mood, anxiety, ADD, distractions, etc.
In the case of these scores, any individual test can vary by 30 points in either direction.
At a personal level, I have had my IQ measured about 15 times (some as part of an experiment: my grad school roommate was a psych major). At my best, I scored a 165. Once. At my worst (in a test used for middle school placement), and scores 118. More typically, I score between 135 and 155. The funny thing is I can tell when I am sharp and when I am not, and my assessment correlates with my score.
This variance is on an adult. Probably an intelligent (AAP worthy) adult.
I have a child who has been tested multiple times since he was about 4 through the IEP process for SN. His scores have varied so much that I think it is laughable that any system can pin much on one score on one day.
Anonymous wrote:PP here.
I am an expert in my field. I do a lot of data analysis. When understanding the data, there is signal and there is noise. In the case of using the CogAT as an IQ test, there are multiple noise sources. The signal is IQ. Noise includes test prep, and many other factors, which include mood, anxiety, ADD, distractions, etc.
In the case of these scores, any individual test can vary by 30 points in either direction.
At a personal level, I have had my IQ measured about 15 times (some as part of an experiment: my grad school roommate was a psych major). At my best, I scored a 165. Once. At my worst (in a test used for middle school placement), and scores 118. More typically, I score between 135 and 155. The funny thing is I can tell when I am sharp and when I am not, and my assessment correlates with my score.
This variance is on an adult. Probably an intelligent (AAP worthy) adult.
Anonymous wrote:Imagine how well so many bright GE kids could do if they were offered the same advanced curriculum! Sad, that the calculus is often how pushy your parents are...
How FCPS is able to get away with this blows my mind.
Anonymous wrote:I wish I had pushed for DS to be in it. His scores were in 120s, but I didn't appeal.
Three years later (he's now in 6th), I'm appalled at what he's being taught. His younger DD is in AAP (who very clearly had test scores for it, but IMO, has abilities similar to DS), and her curriculum is so far superior that I feel he's being cheated. Her homework is challenging, she's excited by it, and I'm really seeing her develop. DS never has homework, unless it's something like "find these words in the newspaper" and is completely unchallenged.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Imagine how well so many bright GE kids could do if they were offered the same advanced curriculum! Sad, that the calculus is often how pushy your parents are...
How FCPS is able to get away with this blows my mind.
After reading the prior post I am starting to come around to your point of view. I really am. The pp said the test only measures what a child knows on that day. What a weakness in the process. Wait, but isn't that true of all tests? And wouldn't it be great if any kid could have thier test scores ignored by claiming "test anxiety?"
The tests measure something which is a function of intelligence, prior knowledge, and how the kid is feeling. What they want to measure is intelligence. A cold reduces mental acuity. A distraction. Those will all impact the score. I will not apologize for being an advocate for my child.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Imagine how well so many bright GE kids could do if they were offered the same advanced curriculum! Sad, that the calculus is often how pushy your parents are...
How FCPS is able to get away with this blows my mind.
After reading the prior post I am starting to come around to your point of view. I really am. The pp said the test only measures what a child knows on that day. What a weakness in the process. Wait, but isn't that true of all tests? And wouldn't it be great if any kid could have thier test scores ignored by claiming "test anxiety?"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I referred DD several years ago. By you definition, more than half of AAP students are "average". By DD's test scores were 118-122.
We referred because for various reasons, we believed the scores were not representative of her ability. We talked to the AAP resource teacher who strongly encouraged us to refer.
The process is just like it is listed in the FCPS web sight. On the advice of the AAP resource teacher, we did not mention the tests. Rather, we emphasized how DD reacts....advanced humor, scientific curiosity, etc.
The thing is the tests are only accurate at measuring how well the kids do on the test that day. My DD used to get a lot of test anxiety. Particularly when the teacher could not answer a question she had --- DD did not understand an instruction. Teacher mentioned that at the parental conference even before we (or she) saw the scores.
DD is now in the 6th grade and is doing fine. And this year, now that they are getting in to more symbolic math (algibraish stuff), she is even excelling in maths.
classic. Just classic. AAP full of kids whose parents know better than the test scores and GBRS.
Anonymous wrote:Imagine how well so many bright GE kids could do if they were offered the same advanced curriculum! Sad, that the calculus is often how pushy your parents are...
How FCPS is able to get away with this blows my mind.
Anonymous wrote:I referred DD several years ago. By you definition, more than half of AAP students are "average". By DD's test scores were 118-122.
We referred because for various reasons, we believed the scores were not representative of her ability. We talked to the AAP resource teacher who strongly encouraged us to refer.
The process is just like it is listed in the FCPS web sight. On the advice of the AAP resource teacher, we did not mention the tests. Rather, we emphasized how DD reacts....advanced humor, scientific curiosity, etc.
The thing is the tests are only accurate at measuring how well the kids do on the test that day. My DD used to get a lot of test anxiety. Particularly when the teacher could not answer a question she had --- DD did not understand an instruction. Teacher mentioned that at the parental conference even before we (or she) saw the scores.
DD is now in the 6th grade and is doing fine. And this year, now that they are getting in to more symbolic math (algibraish stuff), she is even excelling in maths.