Anonymous wrote:Haha unless it's on her tax form
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People have tons of different answers to that question. One I have heard multiple times is real estate should be 20% excluding your primary residence. Another common one is 33%, presumably including your primary residence.
This is almost exactly where we are - real estate is 22% of our portfolio without our primary residence, and 33% with it. The rest is in stocks and bonds with a small amount (less than 5%) in cash. Our net worth is about $1.5M total
Your primary residence is CHEAP. wow.
No, whatever you calculated in your head is their equity in their primary residence, not the value of the actual house. For all we know, their residence could be $800,000 with $150,000 down and just starting to pay the mortgage.
Very close. Primary residence was $725K with a $460K mortgage. I estimate equity at about $220K because I subtract estimated costs associated with selling.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People have tons of different answers to that question. One I have heard multiple times is real estate should be 20% excluding your primary residence. Another common one is 33%, presumably including your primary residence.
This is almost exactly where we are - real estate is 22% of our portfolio without our primary residence, and 33% with it. The rest is in stocks and bonds with a small amount (less than 5%) in cash. Our net worth is about $1.5M total
Your primary residence is CHEAP. wow.
No, whatever you calculated in your head is their equity in their primary residence, not the value of the actual house. For all we know, their residence could be $800,000 with $150,000 down and just starting to pay the mortgage.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People have tons of different answers to that question. One I have heard multiple times is real estate should be 20% excluding your primary residence. Another common one is 33%, presumably including your primary residence.
This is almost exactly where we are - real estate is 22% of our portfolio without our primary residence, and 33% with it. The rest is in stocks and bonds with a small amount (less than 5%) in cash. Our net worth is about $1.5M total
Your primary residence is CHEAP. wow.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People have tons of different answers to that question. One I have heard multiple times is real estate should be 20% excluding your primary residence. Another common one is 33%, presumably including your primary residence.
This is almost exactly where we are - real estate is 22% of our portfolio without our primary residence, and 33% with it. The rest is in stocks and bonds with a small amount (less than 5%) in cash. Our net worth is about $1.5M total
Anonymous wrote:People have tons of different answers to that question. One I have heard multiple times is real estate should be 20% excluding your primary residence. Another common one is 33%, presumably including your primary residence.

Anonymous wrote:I'm a big fan of Dave Ramsey and his no-debt perspective, but I also know that debt (in terms of mortgages) got us to the position we're in today. We own 5 rental properties in DC. Together they make about 20K/month gross - then we pay $13,500 to mortgages and another $1,600 to the property manager. The rest is earmarked for vacancies, repairs, home improvements, and taxes. That "rest" is starting to build up in the account, which is good. Slow and steady.
I'm a little torn between starting to pay the properties off one by one, until all are mortgage-free (which would happen in 14 years anyway if we paid no extra) or gathering up enough for another down payment and adding to our portfolio.
We will be moving back to DC in a year for work (for one year) and then on the road again - we could scratch up enough for a down payment and would qualify for a mortgage since it would be a primary residence. Then when we move in a year, we'd make it another rental. Of course, we would make sure that the rents we could expect would more than pay the mortgage, as we did on the other houses. We have been landlords (until we had to hire the property manager a year ago when we posted overseas) for 11 years and feel pretty confident in our ability to manage well, take care of our tenants, and run a good business. We have the knowledge and experience, and know what to expect. Seems silly to not do it again.
That said, the though of paying them off is really calling to me.
What would you do?
Anonymous wrote:Gee, you make it sound so easy. What types of properties do you own in DC? Are you a slumlord?