Anonymous wrote:
This is the laissez-faire/"oh well, some teachers might not be very good but there's nothing you can do about it" approach to teaching. This is the cross your fingers and hope you get lucky and have a good teacher scenario.
Anonymous wrote:My son's 2nd grade teacher has been clear with the class that mom and dad are not supposed to be doing extra work at home, because she will teach them at school.
Also, she has a whole class to worry about and I try to be sensitive to that. At the 4th grade level there is an opportunity for differentiation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Teacher perspective here.
If the school isn't great at differentiating, then I don't know if it is will be beneficial to ask a teacher to do more differentiating.
Good differentiating has to happen in the lesson planning stages so you can build varying depths of concepts as well as connections and extensions into the lesson. If a teacher isn't great at differentiating and doesn't do it in the planning stages it is really overwhelming to try and do it at the lesson stage because at that point it feels like making an individual lesson for each child (or the 10 kids who need something a little extra) and that is overwhelming and pretty much impossible.
Some teachers are great at adaptive teaching and modifying it during the lesson to meet individual needs and others pretty much just teach the content and hand out the work associated with that lesson regardless of individual needs.
So I guess I would say it depends on your perception of the teacher. If s/he seems to be someone who is invested in the kids and their learning, then a conversation can be very beneficial. If s/he is overwhelmed or not really skilled at differentiating or just teaches to the text, then a conversation will probably not be beneficial.
This is the laissez-faire/"oh well, some teachers might not be very good but there's nothing you can do about it" approach to teaching. This is the cross your fingers and hope you get lucky and have a good teacher scenario.
No it is the just the realistic "if your kid got a crappy teacher, you are unlikely to turn them into a teacher that meets your expectations by asking them to do better". You will have to augment more at home.
Yup. We had mixed teachers in private school. You really can't avoid having some teachers who are unable or unwilling to differentiate. Asking the teacher to change his or her personality is probably not going to work. Changing school districts or going private isn't going to prevent this either. Instead, look into getting DD tested for Johns Hopkins CTY, which is a little overpriced but might give you some options. Or, as others have said, supplement at home.
Bear in mind also, when you supplement, that learning isn't just about doing math or reading faster than everyone else. Not only will she be even further ahead than everybody else, but there's a good chance this is going to start seeming like pressure from you to do her extra math every night. When you supplement, think about adding things that few schools cover well, like geography, or cursive, or Greek mythology. Study the environment. Whatever grabs her imagination.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Teacher perspective here.
If the school isn't great at differentiating, then I don't know if it is will be beneficial to ask a teacher to do more differentiating.
Good differentiating has to happen in the lesson planning stages so you can build varying depths of concepts as well as connections and extensions into the lesson. If a teacher isn't great at differentiating and doesn't do it in the planning stages it is really overwhelming to try and do it at the lesson stage because at that point it feels like making an individual lesson for each child (or the 10 kids who need something a little extra) and that is overwhelming and pretty much impossible.
Some teachers are great at adaptive teaching and modifying it during the lesson to meet individual needs and others pretty much just teach the content and hand out the work associated with that lesson regardless of individual needs.
So I guess I would say it depends on your perception of the teacher. If s/he seems to be someone who is invested in the kids and their learning, then a conversation can be very beneficial. If s/he is overwhelmed or not really skilled at differentiating or just teaches to the text, then a conversation will probably not be beneficial.
This is the laissez-faire/"oh well, some teachers might not be very good but there's nothing you can do about it" approach to teaching. This is the cross your fingers and hope you get lucky and have a good teacher scenario.
No it is the just the realistic "if your kid got a crappy teacher, you are unlikely to turn them into a teacher that meets your expectations by asking them to do better". You will have to augment more at home.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Teacher perspective here.
If the school isn't great at differentiating, then I don't know if it is will be beneficial to ask a teacher to do more differentiating.
Good differentiating has to happen in the lesson planning stages so you can build varying depths of concepts as well as connections and extensions into the lesson. If a teacher isn't great at differentiating and doesn't do it in the planning stages it is really overwhelming to try and do it at the lesson stage because at that point it feels like making an individual lesson for each child (or the 10 kids who need something a little extra) and that is overwhelming and pretty much impossible.
Some teachers are great at adaptive teaching and modifying it during the lesson to meet individual needs and others pretty much just teach the content and hand out the work associated with that lesson regardless of individual needs.
So I guess I would say it depends on your perception of the teacher. If s/he seems to be someone who is invested in the kids and their learning, then a conversation can be very beneficial. If s/he is overwhelmed or not really skilled at differentiating or just teaches to the text, then a conversation will probably not be beneficial.
This is the laissez-faire/"oh well, some teachers might not be very good but there's nothing you can do about it" approach to teaching. This is the cross your fingers and hope you get lucky and have a good teacher scenario.
Anonymous wrote:Why don't you, the parent, address your child's needs? The teacher can't possibly know your child's interests as well as you do.
Anonymous wrote:Teacher perspective here.
If the school isn't great at differentiating, then I don't know if it is will be beneficial to ask a teacher to do more differentiating.
Good differentiating has to happen in the lesson planning stages so you can build varying depths of concepts as well as connections and extensions into the lesson. If a teacher isn't great at differentiating and doesn't do it in the planning stages it is really overwhelming to try and do it at the lesson stage because at that point it feels like making an individual lesson for each child (or the 10 kids who need something a little extra) and that is overwhelming and pretty much impossible.
Some teachers are great at adaptive teaching and modifying it during the lesson to meet individual needs and others pretty much just teach the content and hand out the work associated with that lesson regardless of individual needs.
So I guess I would say it depends on your perception of the teacher. If s/he seems to be someone who is invested in the kids and their learning, then a conversation can be very beneficial. If s/he is overwhelmed or not really skilled at differentiating or just teaches to the text, then a conversation will probably not be beneficial.