Anonymous wrote:There is no way anyone can know for sure now but every indication is that '14 will be at least as bad as '13, maybe worse in that what could be covered with furloughs this year may lead to RIFs (in parts of the Agency I'm familiar with) next year or in '15. But no one knows or can know right now, have to wait for final numbers...
Anonymous wrote:PP, I don't recommend holding off on the baby. It's never going to be a good time. Seriously. It's not worth the possible stress of fertility. Obviously, a home/mortgage change is different - you don't necessarily need bigger for a baby. We live in a 1br w/ den downtown. We're expecting and even with the furlough, it wasn't worth eaiting a year and being older. It doesn't always happen the first or second (or even 5th) month of trying to conceive.
Just a thought!
Also, yes this is THE most ridiculous way to run a government, but Congress won't do anything about it. They won't pass a budget, which is really their one job, and then they'll blame the President. And we feds will be hurt because of it (and many, many others). So sad.
Anonymous wrote:Seems pretty clear that we're going to have a CR for a while. I'd think most agencies should know by now what a continuation of FY'13 funding levels would mean for their personnel budgets.