Anonymous wrote:I was not aware that it had been reported. How do you report a thread?
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thank you , Jeff, for moving it out of Expectant moms. It was clear that people with certain agenda keep starting the same topic over and over again and posting it in Expectant moms in order to convince others not to circumcise.
I am the OP of that thread and I can assure you that I do not "keep starting the same topic over and over again". In fact Jeff can confirm that that thread is the first and only thread that I have started on that topic (though I have contributed to threads started by others). He can also confirm, or you can take a look that the last two threads on circumcision in the Expectant Mom forum were started by people with the opposite "agenda" to mine. The topics were on drinking during pregnancy and circumcision and what mothers would say to their uncircumcised sons when they were older (posted by someone who assumed that there was something to say). The thread on the Royal Prince and cultural attitudes to circumcision had just as much right to be in that forum as did either of those ridiculous posts (particularly as it was a counterbalance to them) and yet, neither of them were moved - I think this tells us something about the moderators view on the topic, which is a shame.
The only recent posts that have been posted in favor of circumcision have been from Jewish women looking for advice on how to handle their families reaction to their discomfort around circumcision/decision not to circumcise. Hardly an "agenda".
Not now being, never having been, nor ever expecting to be an expectant mom, I have very little incentive to read the Expectant Moms forum. I review threads that are reported to me. If you feel that only one side of the debate is being moved, then perhaps only one side of the debate is being reported to me. Though, given that these threads have plenty of messages representing opposing views, I'm not sure why you would assume that threads are moved because of only a single message in them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thank you , Jeff, for moving it out of Expectant moms. It was clear that people with certain agenda keep starting the same topic over and over again and posting it in Expectant moms in order to convince others not to circumcise.
I am the OP of that thread and I can assure you that I do not "keep starting the same topic over and over again". In fact Jeff can confirm that that thread is the first and only thread that I have started on that topic (though I have contributed to threads started by others). He can also confirm, or you can take a look that the last two threads on circumcision in the Expectant Mom forum were started by people with the opposite "agenda" to mine. The topics were on drinking during pregnancy and circumcision and what mothers would say to their uncircumcised sons when they were older (posted by someone who assumed that there was something to say). The thread on the Royal Prince and cultural attitudes to circumcision had just as much right to be in that forum as did either of those ridiculous posts (particularly as it was a counterbalance to them) and yet, neither of them were moved - I think this tells us something about the moderators view on the topic, which is a shame.
The only recent posts that have been posted in favor of circumcision have been from Jewish women looking for advice on how to handle their families reaction to their discomfort around circumcision/decision not to circumcise. Hardly an "agenda".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thank you , Jeff, for moving it out of Expectant moms. It was clear that people with certain agenda keep starting the same topic over and over again and posting it in Expectant moms in order to convince others not to circumcise.
I am the OP of that thread and I can assure you that I do not "keep starting the same topic over and over again". In fact Jeff can confirm that that thread is the first and only thread that I have started on that topic (though I have contributed to threads started by others). He can also confirm, or you can take a look that the last two threads on circumcision in the Expectant Mom forum were started by people with the opposite "agenda" to mine. The topics were on drinking during pregnancy and circumcision and what mothers would say to their uncircumcised sons when they were older (posted by someone who assumed that there was something to say). The thread on the Royal Prince and cultural attitudes to circumcision had just as much right to be in that forum as did either of those ridiculous posts (particularly as it was a counterbalance to them) and yet, neither of them were moved - I think this tells us something about the moderators view on the topic, which is a shame.
The only recent posts that have been posted in favor of circumcision have been from Jewish women looking for advice on how to handle their families reaction to their discomfort around circumcision/decision not to circumcise. Hardly an "agenda".
Anonymous wrote:Thank you , Jeff, for moving it out of Expectant moms. It was clear that people with certain agenda keep starting the same topic over and over again and posting it in Expectant moms in order to convince others not to circumcise.