Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And as a side note ... Why are you taking your vacation before the baby comes instead of using that for your maternity leave??
You only receive Materity Leave if you've been at the company for over a year as a full time employee. I was a temp for two years but as a full time employee it's only been about ten months. So, if i want time off before my baby comes I need to take vacation days. But, from what I've been hearing now I can't even take it off. And if I do they won't give me insurance during the month I give birth.
It just seems wrong and my husband wants to take this up with attorneys. I would rather keep it in-house and deal with it at work...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can see them wanting you to pay for the entire cost of your coverage if you're out on unpaid leave, but not canceling your coverage.
Some companies will drop you from insurance if you aren't working for a period of time (vacation or not), for like two weeks, just for an example. OP, we do not know your employees health coverage and rules. However, you haven't worked their for a full year, so you may not even be eligible for certain benefits. Also, you taking off a month before the baby isn't medically necessary. It's basically a vacation and your employees has the right to not approve it, considering you don't have a doctors note. I'm basically saying, you may not have to go all attorney on them and instead, talk to HR again and ask them what you can do to have that month off and still have coverage of health insurance. I wouldn't piss them off. They too have the right to just fire you.
Hmm, no they can't just fire her. Ha, that's a law suit in the making.
Who are these people who respond? Sheesh! TERRIBLE advise!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can see them wanting you to pay for the entire cost of your coverage if you're out on unpaid leave, but not canceling your coverage.
Some companies will drop you from insurance if you aren't working for a period of time (vacation or not), for like two weeks, just for an example. OP, we do not know your employees health coverage and rules. However, you haven't worked their for a full year, so you may not even be eligible for certain benefits. Also, you taking off a month before the baby isn't medically necessary. It's basically a vacation and your employees has the right to not approve it, considering you don't have a doctors note. I'm basically saying, you may not have to go all attorney on them and instead, talk to HR again and ask them what you can do to have that month off and still have coverage of health insurance. I wouldn't piss them off. They too have the right to just fire you.
Anonymous wrote:I can see them wanting you to pay for the entire cost of your coverage if you're out on unpaid leave, but not canceling your coverage.
Anonymous wrote:There is such a thing called ERISA retaliation - you are not supposed be retaliated against for using your ERISA-covered benefits, which includes health insurance. But from what you wrote it is impossible to tell if they are retaliating against you, or just enforcing existing rules about coverage.
Anonymous wrote:And as a side note ... Why are you taking your vacation before the baby comes instead of using that for your maternity leave??
Anonymous wrote:The answer is probably yes, they can take away your health insurance. Whatever happens though, you need a new employer, that's for sure.