Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I notice that when something negative is said about Christians, they tend to respond with some version of "how dare you insult my faith?"
In contrast when something negative is said about atheists (e.g. "atheists have no morals.") they tend to respond with facts and explanations.
Why do you think this is?
Because atheists are used to explaining themselves. We are a minority.
Christians are a majority and aren't used to being challenged. It's a bit privileged, but c'est la vie.
Anonymous wrote:I've noticed that atheists insult Christians 3-4 times for every time a believer insults atheists.
So it's just basic math that you'd see Christian reactions 3-4 times as much.
I find all the atheist pot-stirring and baiting kind of boring. Yawn. But others react.
Anonymous wrote:I notice that when something negative is said about Christians, they tend to respond with some version of "how dare you insult my faith?"
In contrast when something negative is said about atheists (e.g. "atheists have no morals.") they tend to respond with facts and explanations.
Why do you think this is?
Anonymous wrote:The problem is pretty simple: there's no such thing as having a "respectful" disagreement about religion with a deeply religious person. Because they demand "respect" for every tenet of their faith. And respect seems to be synonymous with "assume it's correct."
They're incapable of hearing any deep critique of religious thinking without getting offended to the core. Case in point, when you ask the most basic and obvious question about religious belief, "Why privilege the Christian God over every other god that humans have worshipped throughout history? Why not Poseidon?" they completely ignore the implications of the question and immediately jump to outrage.
The outrage is pretty normal: When you frame it like that, religious belief--at least the literal, fundamentalist kind--is pretty ridiculous. Therefore you're disrespectful.
Anonymous wrote:The problem is pretty simple: there's no such thing as having a "respectful" disagreement about religion with a deeply religious person. Because they demand "respect" for every tenet of their faith. And respect seems to be synonymous with "assume it's correct."
They're incapable of hearing any deep critique of religious thinking without getting offended to the core. Case in point, when you ask the most basic and obvious question about religious belief, "Why privilege the Christian God over every other god that humans have worshipped throughout history? Why not Poseidon?" they completely ignore the implications of the question and immediately jump to outrage.
The outrage is pretty normal: When you frame it like that, religious belief--at least the literal, fundamentalist kind--is pretty ridiculous. Therefore you're disrespectful.
Anonymous wrote:The problem is pretty simple: there's no such thing as having a "respectful" disagreement about religion with a deeply religious person. Because they demand "respect" for every tenet of their faith. And respect seems to be synonymous with "assume it's correct."
They're incapable of hearing any deep critique of religious thinking without getting offended to the core. Case in point, when you ask the most basic and obvious question about religious belief, "Why privilege the Christian God over every other god that humans have worshipped throughout history? Why not Poseidon?" they completely ignore the implications of the question and immediately jump to outrage.
The outrage is pretty normal: When you frame it like that, religious belief--at least the literal, fundamentalist kind--is pretty ridiculous. Therefore you're disrespectful.
Anonymous wrote:I've noticed that atheists insult Christians 3-4 times for every time a believer insults atheists.
So it's just basic math that you'd see Christian reactions 3-4 times as much.
I find all the atheist pot-stirring and baiting kind of boring. Yawn. But others react.