Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because no one calls it that.
I think OP really doesn't know much about gifted programs and is indeed just looking to pick a fight. The simple fact that he/she is talking about "gifted classes" is testimony to that. The presumption behind "gifted" and "talented" programs is that some kids (I think estimates range from 3-5%) ARE gifted. They don't need to occasional class here and there but an entirely separate program.
But I think what OP is asking is why there (presumably) aren't enough advanced classes. That there aren't is just plain wrong; though possibly there aren't enough. Middle schools and more so high schools in DC (and in truth many elementary schools) do offer advanced options in various formats. For political reasons, no one calls that "gifted and talented" but if you took the time to compare, say, Fairfax' definition of G&T (http://www.fcps.edu/is/aap/column/columnlevelIV.shtml) to what DC does on the ground, there isn't much difference, just differently framed and different lingo.
Now, maybe the problem is that, in search of "advanced classes", you'll need to read up a little and know what you're looking for. You won't find what you're looking for neatly labelled in DC.
I feel like you and I live in parallel universes. I have visited and studied five DCPS middle schools, and aside from Deal, I just don't see the kind of programs that are in abundance in Montgomery, Arlington and Fairfax. Please describe the course sequence for a very bright child at Hardy/Stuart Hobson/Jefferson/Eliot Hine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In most threads, no matter the topic, someone always circles back to the fact that DC does not have test-in gifted/advanced classes especially at the elementary level. I just read on a middle school thread that Deal is no longer offer "honors" courses etc. I get that DCPS is very politically correct and wants to keep ALL kids together regardless of ability but don't they realize that they would keep a heck of a lot more high SES families in the school system if they offered a legit program like most surrounding counties. Its just a a fact that the smarter kids will be bored in a class that teaches to the most struggling studends. ANd in DC that is signficant. So my question is what would it take for DCPS to actually offer gifted classes? And why aren't more parents organizing and demanding this? I suspect its because they worry about appearing racists/classist or elitist. But it may be the thing that finally saves DCPS from losing another 5k students. I keep thinking a test-in model at an underperforming school would do wonders to bring in more parents, money and volunteers which could benefit the entire school.
Am I missing something? Why aren't parents demanding this? (And Im not talking about DCPS and their bs "enrichment programs" a couple of hours a week either). Im sure I will get flamed for this but I think a ton of parents are thinking the same thing but just afraid to bring it up at a PTA meeting.
If DCPS opened a test-in G/T elementary school and your child was selected, how far would you travel? What if the school was opened in the old Savoy elementary school located in Ward 8, but directly across from a subway station, would you enroll your child? Or, would you require the new test-in G/T school to be placed in Wards 1-4, and maybe 6?
Anonymous wrote:Probably because there aren't enough "gifted" children in DC to warrant such a program.
Anonymous wrote:Because no one calls it that.
I think OP really doesn't know much about gifted programs and is indeed just looking to pick a fight. The simple fact that he/she is talking about "gifted classes" is testimony to that. The presumption behind "gifted" and "talented" programs is that some kids (I think estimates range from 3-5%) ARE gifted. They don't need to occasional class here and there but an entirely separate program.
But I think what OP is asking is why there (presumably) aren't enough advanced classes. That there aren't is just plain wrong; though possibly there aren't enough. Middle schools and more so high schools in DC (and in truth many elementary schools) do offer advanced options in various formats. For political reasons, no one calls that "gifted and talented" but if you took the time to compare, say, Fairfax' definition of G&T (http://www.fcps.edu/is/aap/column/columnlevelIV.shtml) to what DC does on the ground, there isn't much difference, just differently framed and different lingo.
Now, maybe the problem is that, in search of "advanced classes", you'll need to read up a little and know what you're looking for. You won't find what you're looking for neatly labelled in DC.
Anonymous wrote:In most threads, no matter the topic, someone always circles back to the fact that DC does not have test-in gifted/advanced classes especially at the elementary level. I just read on a middle school thread that Deal is no longer offer "honors" courses etc. I get that DCPS is very politically correct and wants to keep ALL kids together regardless of ability but don't they realize that they would keep a heck of a lot more high SES families in the school system if they offered a legit program like most surrounding counties. Its just a a fact that the smarter kids will be bored in a class that teaches to the most struggling studends. ANd in DC that is signficant. So my question is what would it take for DCPS to actually offer gifted classes? And why aren't more parents organizing and demanding this? I suspect its because they worry about appearing racists/classist or elitist. But it may be the thing that finally saves DCPS from losing another 5k students. I keep thinking a test-in model at an underperforming school would do wonders to bring in more parents, money and volunteers which could benefit the entire school.
Am I missing something? Why aren't parents demanding this? (And Im not talking about DCPS and their bs "enrichment programs" a couple of hours a week either). Im sure I will get flamed for this but I think a ton of parents are thinking the same thing but just afraid to bring it up at a PTA meeting.
Anonymous wrote:Probably because there aren't enough "gifted" children in DC to warrant such a program.
Anonymous wrote:Probably because there aren't enough "gifted" children in DC to warrant such a program.