Anonymous wrote:It's okay, OP. My son, now 12, didn't show any signs of being particularly smart or bright or gifted or whatever you want to call it at 3 or 4 or 5 years old. But, he is smart, he just does things on his own time and at his own pace. He is also an exceptionally hard worker which I attribute, in part, to the fact that no adults were fawning over him and telling him how gifted he was (kids pick up on this even if its just said "around" them and I should know, my brother was profoundly gifted and has struggled to live up to his IQ his entire life). Well, DS just got accepted to St Albans, based on his grades, academic record and test scores. Don't sweat it. Your DS is 3. There is lots and lots of time for him to grow into academics. All I would say is keep reading to him as much as he wants!
Anonymous wrote:It doesn't matter. Being "smart" has little to do with future success. I would rather my child value perseverance and working hard than be a genius. I have cousins who are brilliant but are skating by in life and accomplishing very little because they don't have those traits.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:WIth all this talk about incredibly bright toddlers reading at 2, etc, makes me wonder whether my kid is normal or 'slow.
DS always seems bright in conversation--he's creative and very verbal. But he's almost 3.5 and does not know all his letters (confuses B and D, for example) or numbers (if asked to count, he start yelling the numbers, in order, but notmatching them with the actual number of items on the page, etc, though I'm pretty sure he understands the concept of counting), and seems to have little interest in learning this stuff. He has little interest in learning most things the traditional way, in fact, though he has become fascinated with our globe (mostly because it spins fast). He resists being 'schooled' in counting, etc. Hates sitting and drawing, hates me "teaching" him, although loves books and stories.
He is home with a lovely nanny and his baby sister, so most of his day is spent in imaginative play, at the park, but she reads a lot to him (as do we) and he goes to the library twice a week for story time. He also exhibits many, many signs of ADHD (which I'm sensitive to b/c we have a strong family tendency) but he is too young to diagnose.
'
Tons of bright kids don't take to early instruction in reading or math. Even profoundly gifted kids don't uniformly take to early reading or early math. Don't worry about it. Just let him be himself.
Anonymous wrote:WIth all this talk about incredibly bright toddlers reading at 2, etc, makes me wonder whether my kid is normal or 'slow.
DS always seems bright in conversation--he's creative and very verbal. But he's almost 3.5 and does not know all his letters (confuses B and D, for example) or numbers (if asked to count, he start yelling the numbers, in order, but notmatching them with the actual number of items on the page, etc, though I'm pretty sure he understands the concept of counting), and seems to have little interest in learning this stuff. He has little interest in learning most things the traditional way, in fact, though he has become fascinated with our globe (mostly because it spins fast). He resists being 'schooled' in counting, etc. Hates sitting and drawing, hates me "teaching" him, although loves books and stories.
He is home with a lovely nanny and his baby sister, so most of his day is spent in imaginative play, at the park, but she reads a lot to him (as do we) and he goes to the library twice a week for story time. He also exhibits many, many signs of ADHD (which I'm sensitive to b/c we have a strong family tendency) but he is too young to diagnose.
'