Anonymous wrote:Homeowners insurance will be much less with the condo, because you will only be insuring your belongings, like a renter's policy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My impression is that
A) non-condos have better resale value
B) Condo fees rise at a higher rate than HOA fees.
C). The definition of what is really covered for "exterior" stuff can vary. In-laws experienced ice-damning and leaking as a result on new construction and the Condo board refused to pay to repair it or work on a long-term solution even though nearly 1/3 of the owners were affected. I think they had to threaten to sue to get it taken care of.
I am the OP, agree. I kind of have that feeling. New house will most likely not to repair for the first 15 years. And if, everybody needs repair, they will jack up the condo fees. Yes, the resale value would be less I assumed.
Anonymous wrote:I would want to know what are the typical water bills at the 1998 house. When I was in a townhouse, our biggest cost driver in our fees was water and unfortunately, because water was shared amongst everyone and there was no way to individually meter it, there wasn't much incentive to conserve.
I'd also double check on your homeowner's insurance on the new construction TH. Just because it is legally a condo doesn't mean you have cheaper homeowners' insurance. Totally depends on what the assn covers in terms of disaster. At my townhouse, it was legally a condo, but I was responsible for all exterior maintenance, roof, etc., so I had to insure it like it was a fee simple home.
Anonymous wrote:My impression is that
A) non-condos have better resale value
B) Condo fees rise at a higher rate than HOA fees.
C). The definition of what is really covered for "exterior" stuff can vary. In-laws experienced ice-damning and leaking as a result on new construction and the Condo board refused to pay to repair it or work on a long-term solution even though nearly 1/3 of the owners were affected. I think they had to threaten to sue to get it taken care of.