Anonymous wrote:Excellent academics but very conservative and traditional.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:bloody hell i roughly checked the acceptance rate for W-L....18%?? It's as tough to get into there as Georgetown or Hopkins and tougher than Haverford, Emory, and Carnegie Mellon?
That's crazy.
Pomona is 14%, Bowdoin is 16% - welcome to the world of college admissions. It's not like it was when you went to college.
I'm not that far removed from undergrad so I know how tough the landscape has been the last 5 years given demographic bubble, more intense marketing campaigns by schools, and common app lowering barriers to applications by making it much smoother/easier to apply to a million schools.
Plus Pomona one could argue is the top LAC given it's academically as good as the top 3 and has a hell of a lot better location, drop dead gorgeous weather, and ultra laid-back personality...and is located in the most populous state in the country..so 14% seems actually higher than what i would've guessed it would be.
Bowdoin is also a top New England LAC.
Is W&L in the same league really as Pomona and Bowdoin and at the same level of Georgetown?
What's the cause of their low acceptance rate? Has it become a super-hot school or is giving truckloads of grant money?
Have they become better at branding themselves like Chicago? just 10 years ago chicago was running 35-40% acceptance rates...now it's below 10 i believe. To use a markets term, their 'alpha' when it comes to driving acceptance rates lower is higher than the average elite school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:bloody hell i roughly checked the acceptance rate for W-L....18%?? It's as tough to get into there as Georgetown or Hopkins and tougher than Haverford, Emory, and Carnegie Mellon?
That's crazy.
Pomona is 14%, Bowdoin is 16% - welcome to the world of college admissions. It's not like it was when you went to college.
I'm not that far removed from undergrad so I know how tough the landscape has been the last 5 years given demographic bubble, more intense marketing campaigns by schools, and common app lowering barriers to applications by making it much smoother/easier to apply to a million schools.
Plus Pomona one could argue is the top LAC given it's academically as good as the top 3 and has a hell of a lot better location, drop dead gorgeous weather, and ultra laid-back personality...and is located in the most populous state in the country..so 14% seems actually higher than what i would've guessed it would be.
Bowdoin is also a top New England LAC.
Is W&L in the same league really as Pomona and Bowdoin and at the same level of Georgetown?
What's the cause of their low acceptance rate? Has it become a super-hot school or is giving truckloads of grant money?
Have they become better at branding themselves like Chicago? just 10 years ago chicago was running 35-40% acceptance rates...now it's below 10 i believe. To use a markets term, their 'alpha' when it comes to driving acceptance rates lower is higher than the average elite school.
Anonymous wrote:To 12:08---you have no idea of the qualifications of the 82% that got rejected. You have a lot of well-qualified students who would never consider W&L because of the conservatism and Greek life and a lot of southern not-so-bright preppies who desperately want that cocoon.
--native Carolinian who went to high school with lots of not-so-bright preppies who aspired to W&L and settled for Hampden-Sydney (motto: where 'men are men and women are guests . . . . ")
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:bloody hell i roughly checked the acceptance rate for W-L....18%?? It's as tough to get into there as Georgetown or Hopkins and tougher than Haverford, Emory, and Carnegie Mellon?
That's crazy.
Pomona is 14%, Bowdoin is 16% - welcome to the world of college admissions. It's not like it was when you went to college.
Anonymous wrote:bloody hell i roughly checked the acceptance rate for W-L....18%?? It's as tough to get into there as Georgetown or Hopkins and tougher than Haverford, Emory, and Carnegie Mellon?
That's crazy.