Anonymous wrote:OP here. I'm not sure if I was clear above. If I take the job as-is, the child care and salary come out basically even. If I can convince them to let me work 3 long days and one half day from home, I can keep the infant home two days and save a little that way. In that case, I would be earning $5000 a year over childcare expenses, or $416 a month before commuting costs, etc. I agree with the PP that there is value staying in the field (and hopefully working up a little) so that when the kids go to kindergarten the take-home will be more. But I also wonder, as another PP does, what the cost is to my kids in the short term. And it sounds crazy to frame it as "I am away from my kids 40 hours a week in exchange for $100."
Agree with pps that this is the incorrect way to think about it. First of all, the childcare money is not coming only out of your salary , but also your husbands. He pays his fair share too. Second of all, paying a lot for childcare is a long-term investment enabling you to stay in the workforce. You can't think about it as paying your whole salary for care.
Plenty of moms would prefer to stay home, but have made this calculation. It is too bad we don't have more family friendly policies in this country but it is what it is.