Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to the most recent proposal (Dec. 20), the only schools that will be affected in the 2013/14 school years are the ones listed in that proposal. The others, at least for now, are put on hold. This was in response to community feedback that FCPS was trying to do too much too soon.

thanks. I didn't realize the others were out of the discussion altogether.

The December 20 version of the proposal is subject to further change by the School Board as amendments may be offered. Monday's (1/14) work session will likely result in discussion around one or more amendments. The School Board's vote on the proposal (and any amendments) is scheduled for January 24.

More schools will be affected in later school years (fall 2014, etc.).

i have the one with the arrows printed out. do you want to tell me the school and i'll put the info here.

the document with the arrows is now gone. but the one on the fcag has the same info without the arrows.

Anonymous wrote:According to the most recent proposal (Dec. 20), the only schools that will be affected in the 2013/14 school years are the ones listed in that proposal. The others, at least for now, are put on hold. This was in response to community feedback that FCPS was trying to do too much too soon.

thanks. I didn't realize the others were out of the discussion altogether.

According to the most recent proposal (Dec. 20), the only schools that will be affected in the 2013/14 school years are the ones listed in that proposal. The others, at least for now, are put on hold. This was in response to community feedback that FCPS was trying to do too much too soon.

Anonymous wrote:OP this is a better link

http://www.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/goto?open&id=934LC855DD28

OP here --- thanks for you kind help and the PP putting up the statement of the Board. That document on the link (at the bottom) is the one I was referencing as the Dec. 20th document with Archer/HW/Haycock. That's not the one I'm looking for. I was looking for the long document that had all the arrows for ALL the schools in FCPS and where they would be realigned. But, if you're trying to say that the rest of the schools (those not included in the Dec. 20th doc -- included in your link) are NOT being considered for realignment, then that's all I need to know. I'm specifically thinking of schools that currently would go to Hughes MS (which is in the South Lakes Pyramid) for AAP even though the assigned HS is Herndon Pyramid. This is a school that would be mis-aligned currently.

OP this is a better link

http://www.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/goto?open&id=934LC855DD28

why are people so nasty. Here is the info OP.

The proposal from December 20 is on BoardDocs:

http://www.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/fi...%20Updated%20Dec%2018-2012.pdf

===
FCPS staff support implementing the recommendations of the Spring 2012 advanced academic program (AAP) Task Force:
To establish at least one elementary AAP center in each pyramid, and an AAP center in every FCPS middle school;
Create and align a K-12 continuum of advanced academic services in all pyramids in order to provide equity of access to all students;
To provide immediate relief to overcrowding in the AAP Centers at Louise Archer, Hunters Woods and Haycock Elementary Schools, staff recommendation is to open new Level IV Advanced Academic Centers at Lemon Road, Westbriar, and Navy elementary schools fall 2013;
Additional elementary and middle school AAP centers should be opened over time to implement the recommendations of the AAP Task Force.
Recommendations:

That the School Board authorize the establishment of new advanced academic program (AAP) centers in fall 2013 at Lemon Road, Westbriar, and Navy Elementary Schools, for the purpose of relieving severe overcrowding at Haycock, Louise Archer, and Hunters Woods Elementary Schools; and further move that the new center placements begin at grade 3 and the rising 4th, 5th and 6th graders will stay at their current AAP centers (“grandfathered”).

That the School Board continue to explore, via thorough analysis and discussion with stakeholders, the expansion of AAP elementary and middle school centers with a goal of potential openings in fall 2013 at the following schools: Silverbrook Elementary, Cooper Middle, Herndon Middle, Thoreau Middle, and South County Middle.

OP here, I've seen a more recent doc. that shows just a few of the schools (Hunters Woods, Archer, etc) and their alignments. Is it the new understanding that the other schools originally slated for re-alignment are now NOT being realigned to keep HS pyramids together? I'm not looking for HW or Archer or Haycock. I'm looking to see where another school (not on the Dec. 20th doc) would be realigned -- but maybe those schools are no longer in the proposal to realign?

You can find the original information showing all the feeder schools at www.fcag.org. It is listed on the front page as the original Level IV task force recommendation.

All of the versions are posted on www.fcag.org

Anonymous wrote:Really? Isn't it obvious that the OP wants the most recent version? Can't think of any reason OP would want outdated information!

It's not obvious to me as the most recent version does not have anything "showing all the AAP feeders and where they would move to if proposal was approved."

Or maybe YOU know of the most recent version that DOES have that included. If so, maybe you ought to post it.

Really? Isn't it obvious that the OP wants the most recent version? Can't think of any reason OP would want outdated information!

Which version? The proposal has changed since first shared in September, then revised again in November for the community meetings, then revised again for the December 10 School Board work session, and then revised again for the December 20 School Board regular meeting.

Looking for the link that was in a DCUM post back in Nov./Dec. showing all the AAP feeders and where they would move to if proposal was approved.

Thanks,