Anonymous
Post 11/29/2012 12:24     Subject: Re:Private only for lower years

OP: thanks for all the responses! We are definitely concerned about having to switch at some point and having to make new friends. But then, for right now I feel like private would definitely be better, so I feel like I should make the decision based on dc's needs now. I hope that by the time middles school rolls around (or HS) transitions will come more easily to dc, as well as ease in making friends. Maybe wishful thinking...
Anonymous
Post 11/29/2012 11:41     Subject: Private only for lower years

My siblings and I all went parochial K-8 and then lg. public h.s. It was a wonderful for us and we all turned out successful and normal.
Anonymous
Post 11/29/2012 11:40     Subject: Private only for lower years

Anonymous wrote:once you get a taste of the good life it's hard to go back. beware.


Especially DC or PG school, they are all horrible even the charters. You would be ok if it is MOCO or Fairfax Count or Arlington (most of the north)
Anonymous
Post 11/29/2012 11:39     Subject: Private only for lower years

Absolutely. I was told by more experienced moms at the time that if you are going to do private at all, do it in the younger years. We did until 8th, then made the transition to Langley High. Guess what? Son's teachers are better than at the tony private school and the program is far more rigorous. Very happy. Also he can navigate a school with 2400 kids so can handle university next year. Worked out very well.
Anonymous
Post 11/29/2012 11:34     Subject: Re:Private only for lower years

Anonymous wrote:My colleague planned on private only for the lower years. When the time came to leave private, the transition away from friends was daunting, so she's made the financial stretch to do private K-12.


Our child left at 9th from private to public and it has been a great change-- new friends and new experiences. So, I guess it depends on the child.
Anonymous
Post 11/29/2012 10:20     Subject: Private only for lower years

it certainly has some advantages; but the big advantages of doing private in HS is the outplacement. **in general** (of course there are exceptions), other things equal, the outplacement is better from the good privates than from the public schools. in that sense, many choose the opposite route of what you are suggesting
Anonymous
Post 11/29/2012 10:04     Subject: Private only for lower years

i agree with PP about its tough to break away. very tough as i have a few that have done it.

our plan is parochial k-8 and then any private school for HS. the nice thing about k-8 is that it forces you to start again. some go to public, many go catholic HS, some go private HS.
Anonymous
Post 11/29/2012 09:58     Subject: Private only for lower years

once you get a taste of the good life it's hard to go back. beware.
Anonymous
Post 11/29/2012 09:52     Subject: Private only for lower years


That's our plan. My kid is only in kindergarten, though. I must say that the small, family feel of the school has made the transition to elementary school wonderful. It's great for the early grades. He might need a bigger environment a bit later.
Anonymous
Post 11/28/2012 22:27     Subject: Re:Private only for lower years

My colleague planned on private only for the lower years. When the time came to leave private, the transition away from friends was daunting, so she's made the financial stretch to do private K-12.
Anonymous
Post 11/28/2012 22:17     Subject: Private only for lower years

OP: thank you! To poster 21:22, this is very nice to hear. We are considering a few schools, none of which end beyond 8th grade. Very reassuring to hear your dc is doing so well! Thanks again!!
Anonymous
Post 11/28/2012 21:22     Subject: Re:Private only for lower years

That's our plan. Small classes were essential for DC, but now my instinct says that he could thrive in almost any environment. He has a solid foundation, amazing study skills, got early exposure to science (from PreK), and is good at making connections between disciplines. I credit all that to his excellent private school. It was worth the investment -- and now at 4th grade, we go public until college.
Anonymous
Post 11/28/2012 19:29     Subject: Private only for lower years

Agree - studies show that the formative years are much more important with small classrooms (up to 3rd grade).
Anonymous
Post 11/28/2012 18:38     Subject: Private only for lower years

absolutely! It would probably be easier if you went to a private that just went to 8th grade. (Natural transition point where everyone is going someplace different for high school.)
Anonymous
Post 11/28/2012 18:35     Subject: Private only for lower years

We are zoned for a great public school cluster, but think private might be better for dc for a variety of reasons. Is it reasonable to think that after several years in private (say, elementary or through MS) dc could go on to a large, well-regarded public? I feel like if dc grows up to become a self-starter and has developed a love for learning, public high school could be a really great place. Thoughts?