Anonymous wrote:This is not redshirting. Redshirting is making the decision to hold a child back a grade because s/he is not ready. Whether you agree with the practice or not, that isn't what OP is contemplaring. Her child entered the lottery last year, but didn't get in anywhere. So she wants to enter him agains this year, but not in the PK4 lottery, because there are fewer slots open there, but in the PK3 lottery, so he has a better chance of getting im. In other words, she wants to game the system (or really, cheat). Because you see, HER kid deserves a greater chance to get into a good charter than OTHER kids who weren't born in September.
OP, I would hope you aren't permitted to do this.
Anonymous wrote:In other words, she wants to game the system (or really, cheat). Because you see, HER kid deserves a greater chance to get into a good charter than OTHER kids who weren't born in September.
OP, I would hope you aren't permitted to do this.
Anonymous wrote:So you think that kids with September birthdays should get two shots at the PS3 lotteries? I guess some people will do anything to game the system. I would call the individual charter schools that interest you to find out if they will accept a student outside of their birthday year.
How does that conversation even go? "My four-year-old is too immature for a four-year-old classroom and needs to be in a three-year-old room?"
Anonymous wrote:Will the school let you do it? We wanted to do that for pk4 at our local dcps, not to get a second shot at getting in, but because she does not have the social skills to be successful as the youngest kid in the class. We successfully entered the lottery, but the school would not let us enroll in prek because she was age-eligible for k.
Anonymous wrote:I can't believe we're actually considering this, but DC missed out on getting into a Charter last year. September birthday -- so it seems like we have a second shot at PS3, which seems like the year with most spots at most charters. Thoughts?