Anonymous wrote:OP I really think you owe it to yourself to try for at least 4-6 months before even CONSIDERING getting any kind of testing or intervention done. You are adding a whole additional level of stress to the process when you have no real reason to think anything is wrong. Irregular periods are not necessarily indicative of anything. I get not wanting to waste time, but the fact is you can't just decide you want to get pregnant and snap your fingers and there it is. You're only 35, you have plenty of time to try for a few months and then, if necessary, seek further medical assistance.
I generally agree that it is premature to go to an RE before you even start TTC, but if having children is very important to you I would consider TTC sooner rather than later. While I know that many of us on this forum come from the minority perspective of having had significant trouble TTC (myself included), it's also worth remembering that statistically, for everyone, fertility declines after the age of 35. This isn't to say you won't be successful without intervention, but your odds diminish because the likelihood that any egg released is viable goes down. This isn't to scare you...many, many people are able to get pregnant easily in their mid-30's. But it's just to remind you that you don't always have time for everything to be perfect. I'm 34, a year into ART, 2 years into TTC. We waited a year after we started talking about TTC; because, I was waiting to settle into the perfect job situation. I don't know if I would have had a baby by now if we started sooner, but I do know that I regret waiting (and I'm not really the type to regret much).
As for whether to see an RE first, I don't think that's necessary before TTC. I went to my OB before starting, but scheduled with an RE after about 9 mos into TTC. TCOYF recommends seeing a specialist if you've been unsuccessful after about 4-6 cylces of TTC with charting...and I think that's about right. Charting should improve your odds of hitting your fertile time enough that if you aren't successful after 4-6 cycles, there is likely an issue. Many RE's don't believe in her method, though. what I can tell you is that my RE has asked me to use OPK's during a natural FET, and charting cervical mucus corresponded exactly to the OPK, even during a really weird cycle, so I think skepticism in the medical community is more that there isn't sufficient data to know how well people need to chart. The science underlying her method is the same as OPKs, it's just that she has you monitor the symptoms the hormones produce in your body while the OPK's monitor them directly.