I have a PhD and work at a think tank. I've also worked in industry and govt, and in each of these settings, it has helped greatly to have the credential.

I work on international issues, although not development - however, my impression of that world is that hands-on experience in the developing world is practically a prerequisite. If you've done this through your research, you may need to emphasize that. If not, maybe consider doing some short-term projects that give you the on-the-ground perspective?

"Targeted" for aid. Sorry. Early morning.

I'm looking to break into humanitarian aid and development. My Ph.D. is helpful with the groups targeting for aid. But, it seems like there's an assumption that I "wouldn't be happy" in those positions. This is the feedback I've gotten and it's frustrating because I continued to the Ph.D. level in the hopes of being better equipped to contribute in this area.

Advice?

I'm not a Ph.D but work with several of them within a consulting firm specializing in strategy and management. Most of our Ph.Ds have a background in economics, finance, organizational , and psychology.

What field are you in? It's pretty common for people with science degrees to not be in academia.

I have a friend who was totally burned out after finishing his doctorate and got s job at radio shack for a year. I'm guessing that's not what you mean though!

I'm a fed, and we have a sprinkling of PhDs in our agency in positions that to not require one.

I'm in government but as a researcher, which is what it sounds like you want to avoid. DH is also in government and he found a job that is half research, half client work. He loves the combination. What's your degree in? Or what fields are you looking to break into?

And, did you have a tough time breaking into non-academic fields? I'm looking for work and find that this is an issue. Any advice on convincing non-research organizations of your interest in a position that doesn't require the doctorate?

I'd really appreciate it.