Anonymous wrote:Yes, Lindamood and CogMed are expensive but also evidence based, which I don't think Learning Rx is.
Can you define what you meant by "evidence-based?" Virginia State and LSU are conducting a study of LearningRx on a $1-mil grant from the National Science Foundation. Furthermore, the various procedures are based on the scientific literature. For example, one uses a stimulus from a classic selective attention study called the Stroop Test.
Anonymous wrote:My DD (12) has ADD, dyslexia, and other serious medical conditions. We have chosen to go with private tutoring and feel like the relationship our family has with our tutor has been invaluable. She is able to adjust to DD's energy levels and academic needs. I can't imagine getting this kind of service from an agency and I don't trust their expertise anyway. It is still expensive, but you get what you pay for.
I work there part time. The pay isn't great, but most of the trainers I work with are K-12 teachers trying to make some extra money in the evenings and over the summer. I personally have a PhD in cognitive psychology - i.e., I study and teach learning, memory, cognition, and perception for a living. I'd say my expertise is fairly trustworthy. You're right, though, that there is a curriculum for the program. But that helps with consistency across the various trainers, although the exact conduct of the program (pace, order, etc.) is different for every kid depending on their strengths and weaknesses.
All that said, education is ridiculously expensive these days. LearningRx does help, but does it help $10k worth? That's hard to say.