Anonymous
09/21/2012 07:57
Subject: How could Robyn Lawley be considered "plus size"???!!!
I imagine she's only a size 12 in designer sizes. At Ann Taylor or Gap, she probably wears a 6.
Anonymous
09/21/2012 06:38
Subject: How could Robyn Lawley be considered "plus size"???!!!
I don't think she's thin but I generally think of plus sizes as being in the 18 and above range.
Anonymous
09/21/2012 01:20
Subject: How could Robyn Lawley be considered "plus size"???!!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She's plus size for a model, not a normal person.
By the way, height doesn't affect size the way you think. Plenty of tall women are still size 6 shirts or skirts. Pants are different because of length. Being tall only changes your size if you are wide, either you skeleton or from weight.
Not true.
I'm a "thin" 6ft woman and wear an 8 skirt. My BMI is borders underweight.
I'd like to hear more about this. I am 6'' and don't consider myself thin at all, wear a 14. And people are always telling me, yah, but you would be a 10 if you were 6 inches shorter.
True?
Anonymous
09/21/2012 01:00
Subject: How could Robyn Lawley be considered "plus size"???!!!
Anonymous wrote:She's plus size for a model, not a normal person.
By the way, height doesn't affect size the way you think. Plenty of tall women are still size 6 shirts or skirts. Pants are different because of length. Being tall only changes your size if you are wide, either you skeleton or from weight.
Not true.
I'm a "thin" 6ft woman and wear an 8 skirt. My BMI is borders underweight.
Anonymous
09/20/2012 17:17
Subject: How could Robyn Lawley be considered "plus size"???!!!
Anonymous wrote: The fashion industry is headed by gay men who have no earthly clue about what is normal for women. They have a desire to cast women in a hyper-feminine and super skinny image. Insane.
Hyper-feminine women are not super skinny. They have hips. Most models look more like twinks than women.
Anonymous
09/20/2012 16:52
Subject: Re:How could Robyn Lawley be considered "plus size"???!!!
She is beautiful but she is plus size. I could not see her wearing an xs or s top at all. Also, the majority of models are not above 6ft.
May I roll my eyes at you? The definition of "plus size" is not "only fits into sizes M and above." That is a seriously skewed take on the world.
This must be the same poster who thinks that anyone not in the 1% is "middle class."
Anonymous
09/20/2012 16:47
Subject: Re:How could Robyn Lawley be considered "plus size"???!!!
Anonymous wrote:She is beautiful but she is plus size. I could not see her wearing an xs or s top at all. Also, the majority of models are not above 6ft.
May I roll my eyes at you? The definition of "plus size" is not "only fits into sizes M and above." That is a seriously skewed take on the world.
Anonymous
09/20/2012 14:16
Subject: How could Robyn Lawley be considered "plus size"???!!!
She's plus sized for a model. So what?
Anonymous
09/20/2012 14:15
Subject: Re:How could Robyn Lawley be considered "plus size"???!!!
She's plus size for a model, not a normal person.
This.
Anonymous
09/20/2012 11:02
Subject: How could Robyn Lawley be considered "plus size"???!!!
Anonymous wrote:She's plus size for a model, not a normal person.
Ditto. I think size 12 is average for plus size models. IRL, I don't consider size 12 plus. Heck, I don't hink plus sized stores (like Lane Bryant) even carry size 12 - they start at size 14.
Anonymous
09/20/2012 10:28
Subject: How could Robyn Lawley be considered "plus size"???!!!
She's plus size for a model, not a normal person.
By the way, height doesn't affect size the way you think. Plenty of tall women are still size 6 shirts or skirts. Pants are different because of length. Being tall only changes your size if you are wide, either you skeleton or from weight.
By the way, height doesn't affect size the way you think. Plenty of tall women are still size 6 shirts or skirts. Pants are different because of length. Being tall only changes your size if you are wide, either you skeleton or from weight.
Anonymous
09/20/2012 10:22
Subject: How could Robyn Lawley be considered "plus size"???!!!
She looks thin to me. At 6'2", she will never be a size 0 because her skeleton alone is too big. The fashion industry is headed by gay men who have no earthly clue about what is normal for women. They have a desire to cast women in a hyper-feminine and super skinny image. Insane.
Anonymous
09/20/2012 10:21
Subject: How could Robyn Lawley be considered "plus size"???!!!
I agree. It's insane. She's gorgeous and thin (in my book) and her body is just as unattainable looking as any other models.
BTW, what does that make "normal" models, minus-size?
BTW, what does that make "normal" models, minus-size?
Anonymous
09/20/2012 10:20
Subject: Re:How could Robyn Lawley be considered "plus size"???!!!
She is beautiful but she is plus size. I could not see her wearing an xs or s top at all. Also, the majority of models are not above 6ft.
Anonymous
09/20/2012 10:17
Subject: How could Robyn Lawley be considered "plus size"???!!!
She may wear size 12 but she is 6' 2"! She looks like a normal healthy young woman. I guess the fashion industry just wants to insult the rest of us.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/09/19/ralph-lauren-hires-first-plus-size-model-robyn-lawley.html
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/09/19/ralph-lauren-hires-first-plus-size-model-robyn-lawley.html