Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When america is turned into a bankrupt european non capitalist country I will be personally feel I did my best to vote against it. it's too late , the population dependent on the government exceeds those that are dependent on themselves. When I say population I am including government jobs , contractors , and those on social government services. The only way is to tax the successful people until everyone has equal social statuses. Eventually there is no spark or reward for innovation and we turn into a society satisfied with meaningless jobs that don't create anything that can be sold to generate revenue and taxes. We are screwed because people don't have the foresight to see this and only care about the short term. We will be greece.
I don't understand what you're saying here -- are you saying the only respectable way to earn a living is to be self employed? Goverment workers aren't dependent on themselves? Employees in the private sector are dependent on their employers, just like public sector employees. You have a problem with cops? Teachers? Firemen?
The goal of the private sector is to create profits which builds wealth, the government ones are expenses.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When america is turned into a bankrupt european non capitalist country I will be personally feel I did my best to vote against it. it's too late , the population dependent on the government exceeds those that are dependent on themselves. When I say population I am including government jobs , contractors , and those on social government services. The only way is to tax the successful people until everyone has equal social statuses. Eventually there is no spark or reward for innovation and we turn into a society satisfied with meaningless jobs that don't create anything that can be sold to generate revenue and taxes. We are screwed because people don't have the foresight to see this and only care about the short term. We will be greece.
I don't understand what you're saying here -- are you saying the only respectable way to earn a living is to be self employed? Goverment workers aren't dependent on themselves? Employees in the private sector are dependent on their employers, just like public sector employees. You have a problem with cops? Teachers? Firemen?
Anonymous wrote:I don't really get the point if this post, OP, and I'm a liberal Democrat. And you do sound a little smug. Which worries me, because this usnt over til the votes are counted.
However, in the name of empathy I can imagine there are many Republicans who feel about Romney as the many Democrats did about John Kerry in 2004.. A super-rich guy who couldn't relate to the masses, and who flip flopped on the issues, selling his soul just to get elected. But we voted for him anyway because we hated the alternative and hoped he'd stay relatively true to liberal values if elected.
Anonymous wrote:When america is turned into a bankrupt european non capitalist country I will be personally feel I did my best to vote against it. it's too late , the population dependent on the government exceeds those that are dependent on themselves. When I say population I am including government jobs , contractors , and those on social government services. The only way is to tax the successful people until everyone has equal social statuses. Eventually there is no spark or reward for innovation and we turn into a society satisfied with meaningless jobs that don't create anything that can be sold to generate revenue and taxes. We are screwed because people don't have the foresight to see this and only care about the short term. We will be greece.
I thought Obama was supposed to make those Muslim countries love USA and be nice to us, by power of his charm.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: if you look around these forums, you can't find a single strong argument from the republican side on any issue.
Come on republicans. You are safe here
No, this isn't a safe place to have a frank discussion about politics.
Really? You mean this place is not polite. I think it is very difficult to call an anonymous Internet forum unsafe, when the topic is not even a personal one.
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:
No, this isn't a safe place to have a frank discussion about politics.
You keep saying this and I really have a hard time understanding your point. Are you afraid that that if you are pro-Romney someone is going to hunt you down and beat you? Are you afraid of being stoned or deported to a Siberian work camp? Come on, the worse that is going to happen is that someone is going to counter your post with an opposing viewpoint.
Anonymous wrote:
No, this isn't a safe place to have a frank discussion about politics.
Anonymous wrote: if you look around these forums, you can't find a single strong argument from the republican side on any issue.
Come on republicans. You are safe here
No, this isn't a safe place to have a frank discussion about politics.