Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Wait, I thought Bubba was the first black president?![]()
+1, BTW
I'm the PP you quoted. Some might say that Bubba is blacker than Obama. But Obama seems to threaten people in ways that Clinton did not.
Anonymous wrote:You must be so disappointed about the number of new jobs created last month for your fellow Americans who are out of work.Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:We get to choose the stump that doesn't have a backbone and is more interested in giving speeches and looking cool.
Yet, that "stump" is beating Romney, who has less backbone, gives worse speeches, and looks less cool.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/
Come again?
You don't really believe Rasmussen, do you? Obama leads in most of the other polls.
According to your own source above:
Electoral College: Obama 221, Romney 191
Battleground states: Obama leads 13 out of 17.
And, that is before the convention bounce.
Again, it shows that all polls are too close to call.
Any bounce from the DNS will be slammed down if another horrible jobs number comes out tomorrow.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Clinton and Obama have a very similar appeal to me. They are both smart, third-way moderates who give great speeches. They have different working and personal styles, but they have a lot more in common than not. Both are committed to public service and to working towards a fair capitalist society. Both want to see Americans have jobs and access to health care. Both want a balanced budget and realistic taxation. I see much more similarity than difference.
Unless you're hung up on race, that is.
Wait, I thought Bubba was the first black president?![]()
+1, BTW
You must be so disappointed about the number of new jobs created last month for your fellow Americans who are out of work.Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:We get to choose the stump that doesn't have a backbone and is more interested in giving speeches and looking cool.
Yet, that "stump" is beating Romney, who has less backbone, gives worse speeches, and looks less cool.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/
Come again?
You don't really believe Rasmussen, do you? Obama leads in most of the other polls.
According to your own source above:
Electoral College: Obama 221, Romney 191
Battleground states: Obama leads 13 out of 17.
And, that is before the convention bounce.
Again, it shows that all polls are too close to call.
Any bounce from the DNS will be slammed down if another horrible jobs number comes out tomorrow.
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:We get to choose the stump that doesn't have a backbone and is more interested in giving speeches and looking cool.
Yet, that "stump" is beating Romney, who has less backbone, gives worse speeches, and looks less cool.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/
Come again?
You don't really believe Rasmussen, do you? Obama leads in most of the other polls.
According to your own source above:
Electoral College: Obama 221, Romney 191
Battleground states: Obama leads 13 out of 17.
And, that is before the convention bounce.
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:We get to choose the stump that doesn't have a backbone and is more interested in giving speeches and looking cool.
Yet, that "stump" is beating Romney, who has less backbone, gives worse speeches, and looks less cool.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/
Come again?
Anonymous wrote:Clinton and Obama have a very similar appeal to me. They are both smart, third-way moderates who give great speeches. They have different working and personal styles, but they have a lot more in common than not. Both are committed to public service and to working towards a fair capitalist society. Both want to see Americans have jobs and access to health care. Both want a balanced budget and realistic taxation. I see much more similarity than difference.
Unless you're hung up on race, that is.
Anonymous wrote:Clinton and Obama have a very similar appeal to me. They are both smart, third-way moderates who give great speeches. They have different working and personal styles, but they have a lot more in common than not. Both are committed to public service and to working towards a fair capitalist society. Both want to see Americans have jobs and access to health care. Both want a balanced budget and realistic taxation. I see much more similarity than difference.
Unless you're hung up on race, that is.
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:We get to choose the stump that doesn't have a backbone and is more interested in giving speeches and looking cool.
Yet, that "stump" is beating Romney, who has less backbone, gives worse speeches, and looks less cool.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/
Come again?
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:We get to choose the stump that doesn't have a backbone and is more interested in giving speeches and looking cool.
Yet, that "stump" is beating Romney, who has less backbone, gives worse speeches, and looks less cool.
Anonymous wrote:We get to choose the stump that doesn't have a backbone and is more interested in giving speeches and looking cool.