Anonymous wrote:Here's an example - suppose I decided that Christians shouldn't be allowed to worship in the style they prefer. I don't hate them personally. I just don't think they should have access to Bibles or be allowed to gather in Christian churches or say prayers in public or wear crosses anywhere. I don't have anything against them personally. I just think they're behavior is deeply twisted and that no one should engage in it because obviously a religion is a choice and people can choose other religions.
Now suppose I formed an organization to lobby for legislation to support my views and I encouraged lots of people to join me in my views. Nothing personal, y'know, I just think my child should be protected from people who use cannibalism as part of their worship (eating the body and drinking the blood - what else could that be?). So no Christians should be allowed to join her Girl Scout troop and I definitely wouldn't want any Christians teaching her.
I'm a nice family person, I'm not rude in public, I tell you I don't hate you, just your behavior - which you could choose not to engage in. I have to protect my family after all.
Do you really think you would believe that I didn't basically hate you and what you stand for? That I wasn't trying to hurt you in a fundamental way or to destroy what is sacred to you and your identity? I will tell you over and over I don't hate you but what do you think it would feel like to you?
Then think about how it would feel if you were a 12-year-old. And that's why I can't forgive Focus on the Family for what they do. I've seen what it did to my middle-schooler, who, thank God, has survived it but no child should ever have to feel that way ever.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's because they actively lobby for exclusionary/ discriminatory legislation and practices.
It's one thing to encourage folks to follow "traditional" values. It's another to try to outlaw any other choice.
So does that make the Brady Campaign a hate group since they try to outlaw guns? How about Mary Cheh and Michael Bloomberg? They've tried to outlaw the choice to enjoy a soda. Your argument is unconvincing. Also being on a different side of a law doesn't make you "hate" does it?
It all comes down to "harm". Guns harm theaters full of Batman fans or houses of worship full of religious minorities. Too much sugar harms health which drives up publicly-paid healthcare costs, harming the healthcare system. (I'm not on board with that one, but I assume that's the argument.) Gay marriage between consenting adults harms... who, now?
Now you are just reaching. Your definition of "harm" is not universal. Perfectly sane adults can own guns and not "harm" anyone. Using your same stretched logic gay men might prey on little boys. Not saying it's true but it's reaching for one outcome and applying it to all others.
Hey, I answered your question as if it were sincere. Now that I see you have an agenda, I'm out. I don't engage with fundamentalists.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's because they actively lobby for exclusionary/ discriminatory legislation and practices.
It's one thing to encourage folks to follow "traditional" values. It's another to try to outlaw any other choice.
So does that make the Brady Campaign a hate group since they try to outlaw guns? How about Mary Cheh and Michael Bloomberg? They've tried to outlaw the choice to enjoy a soda. Your argument is unconvincing. Also being on a different side of a law doesn't make you "hate" does it?
It all comes down to "harm". Guns harm theaters full of Batman fans or houses of worship full of religious minorities. Too much sugar harms health which drives up publicly-paid healthcare costs, harming the healthcare system. (I'm not on board with that one, but I assume that's the argument.) Gay marriage between consenting adults harms... who, now?
Now you are just reaching. Your definition of "harm" is not universal. Perfectly sane adults can own guns and not "harm" anyone. Using your same stretched logic gay men might prey on little boys. Not saying it's true but it's reaching for one outcome and applying it to all others.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's because they actively lobby for exclusionary/ discriminatory legislation and practices.
It's one thing to encourage folks to follow "traditional" values. It's another to try to outlaw any other choice.
So does that make the Brady Campaign a hate group since they try to outlaw guns? How about Mary Cheh and Michael Bloomberg? They've tried to outlaw the choice to enjoy a soda. Your argument is unconvincing. Also being on a different side of a law doesn't make you "hate" does it?
It all comes down to "harm". Guns harm theaters full of Batman fans or houses of worship full of religious minorities. Too much sugar harms health which drives up publicly-paid healthcare costs, harming the healthcare system. (I'm not on board with that one, but I assume that's the argument.) Gay marriage between consenting adults harms... who, now?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's because they actively lobby for exclusionary/ discriminatory legislation and practices.
It's one thing to encourage folks to follow "traditional" values. It's another to try to outlaw any other choice.
So does that make the Brady Campaign a hate group since they try to outlaw guns? How about Mary Cheh and Michael Bloomberg? They've tried to outlaw the choice to enjoy a soda. Your argument is unconvincing. Also being on a different side of a law doesn't make you "hate" does it?
Anonymous wrote:It's because they actively lobby for exclusionary/ discriminatory legislation and practices.
It's one thing to encourage folks to follow "traditional" values. It's another to try to outlaw any other choice.